What mattered today
Defense expert Dr. Phillip Resnick testified Clancy suffered from Bipolar II with severe depression and postpartum psychosis on January 24, 2023, rendering her unable to conform her conduct to the law due to command hallucinations.
Prosecution cross-examination highlighted that Clancy repeatedly denied homicidal thoughts to her healthcare providers and that Tewksbury Hospital records documented her as clinically stable without observable psychosis.
The defense officially rested its case following the conclusion of Dr. Resnick's testimony.
Prosecution called expert psychiatrist Dr. Avram Mack, who diagnosed Clancy with a major depressive episode rather than bipolar disorder, finding no evidence of mania, hypomania, or active psychosis leading up to the events.
Dr. Mack concluded Clancy retained criminal responsibility, pointing to her methodical actions, intact daily routine on January 24, and awareness that harming her children was wrong.
Defense cross-examination of Dr. Mack emphasized Clancy's complex medication history and highlighted that she was evaluated in a psychiatric facility while under continuous 24-hour observation.