This court is now in session. Please be seated.
Courtroom Transcript
Trial Day 2
Public transcript presented in a structured reader format. Speaker identities are displayed only when verified. Raw source labels remain preserved in the underlying data.
Good morning, Your Honor. May I proceed?
Yes, please.
Your Honor, before the court today, we have the matter of Commonwealth versus Lindsay Clancy. Ms. Clancy is present. She is represented by Attorney Kevin Reddington. And the Commonwealth is represented by Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague and Assistant District Attorney Shanan Buckingham.
Hi. Good morning, Counsel.
Morning.
Morning.
Good morning, Ms. Clancy.
Morning.
All right. Before we get started, could I see Counsel at sidebar briefly?
[inaudible 00:21:29].
Yeah. That's the final.
[inaudible 00:21:37].
Yeah. Yeah. So, Counsel, we're ready for the jury?
Yes.
Yes.
[inaudible 00:22:00].
Okay. [inaudible 00:23:05].
Court. All rise. Jury is entering. Hear ye, hear ye, hear ye. All persons having anything to do before the Honorable William Sullivan, Justice of the Superior Court, now sitting in Plymouth, within and for the Commonwealth, draw near, give your attendance, and you shall be heard. God save the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This court is now in session. Please be seated.
Good morning, Your Honor. May I proceed?
Yes, please.
Your Honor, before the court today, we have the continuation of the jury trial in the matter of Commonwealth versus Lindsay Clancy. Ms. Clancy is present, and she is represented by Attorney Kevin Reddington. And the Commonwealth is represented by Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague and Assistant District Attorney Shanan Buckingham.
All right. Thank you, Madam Clerk. Well, good morning, everyone.
Good morning, Judge.
Nice to see everyone again. So what I want to do is just kind of go through. First, I'm going to ask you those couple of questions, make sure that everybody is able to follow my instructions. Then I'm going to go over today's schedule and maybe discuss a little bit about the week's schedule so you kind of have an idea where we're going with this. So first, let me ask those questions. Excuse me. The first question, has any member of the jury read, seen, or heard anything about this case that would affect your ability to be fair and impartial as a juror in this case?
No, Your Honor.
Next question. Is there any other serious matter or concern bearing on your service as a juror that anybody needs to bring to my attention at this time? All right. Again, thank you for following those instructions. Now, the schedule that we're going to follow today is we're going to continue with the case with the Commonwealth's witness who was on the stand Monday. And then we're going to take ... today, be a little bit ... Might be broken up a little bit. There may be a couple of breaks that we have to take during the course of that, but we'll try and keep those to a minimum. But we'll take a break at one o'clock, and then we'll come back this afternoon, and we'll probably go to sometime between 3:00 and 4:00. All right. Hopefully, I think tomorrow will be pretty much the same schedule. Tomorrow's Thursday. And then Friday, we are planning to go on that view. All right. And as a judge, I can control a lot of things, but I can't control the weather. All right? And so we've checked. It looks like the weather should be fine in regards to do this, but we'll talk a little bit more about that tomorrow. But that's just in case I forget about that. That's what we're going to do. So on Friday, you may want to make sure you have a jacket with you, or comfortable shoes, but we'll go into that a little bit more. So that's the schedule that we anticipate for the rest of the week. So on Friday, we do the view, we'll come back. We usually generally do that in the morning. And then we'll come back and we'll probably go to, again, probably around 3:00 or 4:00 if we can. All right. And then on Friday, I'll discuss with you the next week's schedule and kind of where we are in the timeline of this case. All right. So I'll try and keep you up to date as best I can in regards to the case. But like I said, there may be some unanticipated breaks here and there that we're going to have to take. So with that, we're going to return now to the Commonwealth's case. Commonwealth had a witness on the stand at that time. I'm going to ask, Ms. Sprague, if you could recall that witness, please.
Thank you, Your Honor. We recall Patrick Clancy.
[inaudible 00:27:40]. I want you to watch your step. [inaudible 00:27:44].
Please raise your right hand, sir. Do you solemnly swear that the testimony and the evidence you shall give to the court and the jury in the matter now pending between the Commonwealth and the defendant [inaudible 00:27:54] shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Yes.
Thank you. You may have a seat.
Hi. Good morning, sir. Hi. Ms. Sprague.
Thank you, Your Honor. Good morning.
Good morning.
So on Monday, I had asked you some questions about the Surface Pro that you and the defendant had in your home and had access to, and about whether you had looked at a site on suicide methods on August 22nd. If I could ask you, did you look at a site for suicide methods on August 23rd, 2022?
I don't believe so.
Okay. And I had also asked you on Monday about when you were leaving the home on the night of January 24th, 2023, your observations of Lindsay and the children. Do you recall that?
Yes.
And you had testified that you observed Dawson on the couch eating, I believe you said chicken nuggets and green beans. Is that correct?
Yeah.
Do you recall, if you're facing the couch, where he was on the couch?
If I were facing the couch, he'd be to the right.
To the right. Okay. And showing you a photograph of the living room where there are some bowls on the couch. Is that a fair and accurate depiction of how the couch looked that night?
Yeah.
We could have this photo marked as the next exhibit.
All right. Any objection?
No. [inaudible 00:29:29].
All right. That may be admitted.
[inaudible 00:29:31]. Now, as you're getting ready to leave the house to head out to get the takeout, did Lindsay say anything to you?
Nothing specific that I can recall, just other than maybe goodbye.
Do you recall discussing something about CVS with her?
Yeah.
Okay. And what did she say about CVS?
She wanted me to pick up some stool softener for Cora.
And she hadn't mentioned that earlier in the text, correct?
Yeah. I don't think so.
Okay. So as you're leaving, she asked you to make a second or another stop while you're out. Is that correct?
Correct.
Okay. And in response to that request, did you ask her to do something?
I don't remember.
If I could show you page 77, lines 23 and 24, if you could just read those to yourself.
Yeah. I told her to text it to me, which she did.
I'm sorry. So that refreshed your memory. And asked her to text it to you?
Yeah.
And did she do so?
She did.
And was that at approximately 5:15 PM that she texted, "Pedia-Lax"?
Sounds correct.
So your two stops then that night were going to be CVS and the ThreeV Restaurant, correct?
Yes.
Where did you go first?
CVS.
And do you remember the route that you took to get there?
Yeah. I went out our driveway, took a right on Winter Street, and then took a left on the main road, and went to CVS.
So it's a pretty direct route from your house to CVS?
Yeah.
Just a moment. Just going to have you look at the screen, if you would, to a map. And coming into this red dot here, is that the approximate location of your home at 47 Summer Street?
Yeah.
And then looking at this pink dot here next to Big Y, is that where the CVS is located?
Yes.
And that's the CVS you went to that night?
Yes.
About how long did it take you to get there?
Three minutes.
And when you got to CVS, did you go inside?
Yes.
Okay. And what section did you go to in CVS?
I think it was pediatrics.
Okay. If we could pull up the CVS video. I'm going to ask you to look at the video here. Is that you entering the store?
Yeah.
Okay. And that section you head to on the right, is that the pediatric medication section?
Yeah.
Okay. And while you're in that section looking for the medication, do you do something?
I called Lindsay.
And why did you call Lindsay?
Because what we were looking for wasn't there. The shelves were pretty empty. It was still during COVID.
It was ... I'm sorry. What?
It was during COVID, so ...
Okay. And was that call at about approximately 5:33 PM?
Yeah.
Okay. And then did she answer the call?
Yes.
She answered when you called her?
Actually, I think she didn't at first. She called back.
Okay. And did you receive a call back from her about a minute later at 5:34 PM?
Yeah. That's correct.
Okay. And can you describe that phone call for us?
It was very brief. I just said ... I think there was a generic brand. And I said, "Is this one okay?"
Just said, "I think there's a generic brand." And I said, "Is this one okay?" And she said, "Yeah, that's fine."
And what was her demeanor during the call?
She was pretty quiet. It sounded like she was busy. I remember hanging up thinking she's probably in the middle of giving baths or something like that.
So it sounded to you like she was in the middle of something?
Yeah.
Were you able to understand her when she spoke to you?
Yeah.
And did she seem to understand what you were saying?
Yes.
And she didn't seem to have any trouble recalling why you were at CVS or what you were looking for?
That's correct.
And did you in fact purchase some Pedia-Lax at CVS?
Yes.
Did you purchase anything else while you were there?
I bought a pack of Skittles.
Just showing you a receipt here from CVS. Does this appear to be an accurate description of what was purchased?
Yeah.
If we could have the CVS receipt marked as the next exhibit, please.
All right. That may be admitted.
Exhibit 26.
And then if we could have the original CVS video marked as an exhibit and the CVS timeline, a condensed version marked as the following exhibit.
E27 and E28.
We have the original marked as 27. And the timeline is 28, please.
Exhibit 26, 27 and 28 so marked.
All right. Thank you.
After you had made your purchases at CVS, where did you go next?
To ThreeV.
And do you remember the route you took to get there?
Yeah, I think I got on Route 3 South for I think just one exit and then I got off and went straight to ThreeV. Okay.
And showing you the map again here on the screen. This green dot here on the bottom, is that where ThreeV restaurant is located?
Yeah.
Copy of the map. Your Honor, I'd move to submit a copy, a digital copy of the map. We have it on the computer. I can make a hard copy.
No objection.
All right. That may be admitted.
We can use empty case as a marker. Exhibit 29?
All right. Thank you.
If we could pull up the ThreeV video, please. Now, sir, how long approximately did it take you to get from CVS to ThreeV?
Probably around 10 minutes.
And when you got to the ThreeV restaurant, did you go inside?
Yeah.
I'm just going to ask you to watch the video on the screen. About 5:54:15 PM, is that you coming in behind that other couple there?
Yeah.
And what are you doing at that point when you're looking at the bags?
I think I was looking for the bag with my name on it.
Do you recall what you're doing on your phone at that time?
I don't. It could be work related. It could be anything.
Okay. And the order that was listed under your name and phone number, correct?
I think Lindsay ordered it.
Right. But do you recall whose name it was under when you picked it up?
I don't recall specifically, but it could have been mine.
Show you a receipt here from ThreeV restaurant for Mediterranean parable and scallop and pork belly risotto. If you could just look at the name and the number on the receipt.
Yeah, that's my name and my number.
So that's your phone number?
Yep.
Okay. So although the defendant called in the order, your name and phone number were given and were given accurately. Is that correct?
Correct.
If we could have the ThreeV video marked as the next exhibit.
Sure. That may be admitted.
Exhibit 30 so marked, Your Honor.
[Inaudible 00:40:03]
Yeah. Can I see counsel just very briefly?
Can I just have the receipt marked as the next exhibit?
Exhibit 39.
All right. It's subject to the court's order that may be admitted.
Sir, after picking up the order at ThreeV, where did you go next?
Home.
And do you recall the route you took home?
Probably the same route. One exit on the highway and then went home.
Okay. Do you recall approximately how long it took you to get home?
I would guess 10 to 12 minutes.
Okay. When you arrived home, where did you park?
In the driveway.
What type of car did you drive then?
A Chevy Silverado.
And was that a white pickup truck?
Yeah.
What kind of car did Lindsay drive then?
It was a Kia SUV.
And once you parked there, were both vehicles now in the driveway?
Yeah.
I'm going to show you a series of photographs of the exterior of your home. If you could just look through them and tell me if they accurately reflect how your home looked on January 24th, 2023.
Yeah, these are accurate.
If I could have these photographs of the interior of the home, front and back marked sequentially as next exhibits?
They may be admitted. Thank you.
32 through 37, 38. So marked.
So sir, showing you what's been marked as Exhibit 32. Is this the front of your house with the main door?
Yes.
And then showing you what's been marked as Exhibit 33. Where is this in relation to that main front door?
It's to the right.
And here where the light is that a secondary entrance at the front of the house?
Yes.
Okay. And for the record, that's to the left of the garage?
Yep.
Showing you Exhibit 34. Can you tell us what portion of the house this is?
It's to the left of the front door.
So if I'm facing the front door, it's to the left. There's a fence there. Is that correct? And Exhibit 35, is that more of that same fence on the left?
Yes.
And then showing you Exhibit 36, is this looking at your backyard from that left side area where the fence is?
Yeah.
And then Exhibit 37, can you tell us what we're seeing here?
This is the back of the house and the window where Lindsay jumped out.
And Exhibit 38, is that a more direct view of that back of the house?
Yeah.
And so the window you referenced about Lindsay, is it this upper right top window?
Yeah.
And what is behind that window?
Our bedroom.
And the window to the left there in the middle, what room is that window in?
That's the upstairs bathroom.
And then the top window on the far left, what room is that for?
That was Dawson's bedroom.
Dawson's? Okay. And then directly below the top right window, so the bottom far right window, what room is that window for?
The living room.
And then again, the middle window on the bottom level?
Downstairs bathroom.
And then that window on the far left there, is that the kitchen?
Yeah.
And on the far left of the photo where the sliding glass doors are, where does that lead into?
There's like a room off of the kitchen where there is a kitchen table.
When you got home and you parked your truck, how did you get into the home?
I went in through that side door.
The door that was to the left of the garage?
Yeah.
And what did you do once you got inside the home?
I started taking my boots off.
And did you have some bags with you from CVS and ThreeV?
Yeah.
Where did you place those?
On the kitchen island.
Show you a couple photos of that area where you came in. Just tell us if it accurately represents how that area looked on January 24th, please.
Yeah, that's accurate.
Could have these two photos marked with the next two exhibits, please.
They may be admitted.
Exhibits 39 and 40.
Sir, I'm showing you what's been marked as Exhibit 39. Can you tell us where the sliding glass doors are in this photograph?
They're to the left of the kitchen table.
So we have here the kitchen table kind of in the center of the photograph. Is that correct?
Yeah.
And so these are the sliding glass doors?
Yeah.
And where is the door that you came through?
To the right after the kitchen table.
Right here next to the curtain?
Yeah.
And the door, when you're looking at the photo straight ahead, this door to the left of the mirror or the photo there, where does that lead?
The garage.
And then showing you Exhibit 40, is that where you placed the bags on the island in the kitchen?
Yeah.
When you came into the house and you were taking off your boots and putting things down, was there anything you noticed?
Yeah, the house was really quiet.
Is that unusual?
Yeah.
And when you realized it was really quiet, what did you do?
I called out.
And who did you call out to?
Everyone.
Did anyone answer?
No.
After you called out and no one answered, what did you do next?
I don't know the order, but I called down in the basement and no one answered. And then I called Lindsay to see if she was home because I looked out and I couldn't see her car, but it's because it was dark and her car's black.
Okay. So when you say you called down to the basement, when you approached the basement door, do you remember if it was open or shut?
It was shut.
So did you open it and yell down?
Yeah.
And there was no response?
Correct.
And showing you a photo here. Is that a fair and accurate depiction of the stairway down to the basement level?
Yeah.
If we could have this marked as the next exhibit, please.
It may be admitted.
Exhibit 41.
Do you recall when you opened the door to yell down whether the light was on or off?
Yeah, it was on, but Lindsay always left the light on.
Okay. And you said you called Lindsay. Was that a phone call?
Yeah.
And was that at approximately 6:09 PM?
Yeah.
And did she answer?
No.
After calling down the stairs to the basement, did you leave the door open or did you close it?
I don't remember.
Okay.
I would think I closed it because I always try to keep it closed. I'm not sure.
Okay. And so after you called Lindsay and didn't get a response, what did you do next?
I started checking upstairs.
And where did you check upstairs?
First, the bathroom. I thought maybe they were taking baths, but there was no one there.
And then where did you go?
The kids' bedrooms.
Was there anyone in the kids' bedrooms?
No.
And then did you go to your bedroom?
Yeah.
And were you able to get into your bedroom right away?
No, the door was locked and that's when I knew something was wrong.
And when you realized the door was locked, did you have a way to unlock it?
Yeah. The previous owners, when they installed the doorknobs, had these keys that they taped to the back of each door. So I got the one from Cora's room and then I started unlocking the knob.
Okay. And when you unlocked the door to your bedroom, did you go in?
Yeah.
And what did you see when you opened the door and went in?
I just saw blood everywhere and the window is open.
And showing you here a photo. Is this the bed in your bedroom?
Yeah.
Now, the way the bed is in this photo, kind of pulled away from the wall and slightly askew or at an angle. Is that the way it was typically?
No.
And when you left the bedroom that day for the last time prior to coming home later that night, was the bed in that position?
I don't think so.
Could I have this photo marked as the next exhibit.
It may be admitted.
Exhibit 42.
And you said you saw the window, is that correct?
Yeah.
Was it open?
Yeah, there was wind blowing in.
Showing you a photo here. Is that a fair and accurate depiction of how the window looked?
Yeah.
Mark this as the next exhibit, please.
That may be admitted.
Exhibit 43.
Did you walk into the room and over to the window?
No.
How far into the room did you get?
Probably one or two steps, and then I immediately turned around and went outside.
And the blood that you saw, where was that located in the room?
It was everywhere. It looked like it was sprayed almost with a hose, and there was a huge puddle in the middle of the room, and it was sprayed all over pretty much every surface. I remember it was on the doorknob.
Okay. Showing you three photos. Do you recognize what's depicted there? And is that a fair and accurate depiction of how the room looked on January 24th, 2023?
Yeah.
We could have these three photos marked as the next three exhibits.
It may be admitted.
Exhibit 44, 45, 46.
Sir, showing you what's been marked Exhibit 44. Is this the entrance to the room looking into the room?
Yeah.
And then Exhibit 45, is this mirror to the right of that bureau we were just looking at?
Yep.
And this area right here, is this the blood you were referring to?
Yeah, that's some of the blood.
And then in Exhibit 46, is that getting closer to the window?
Yeah.
And is that more of the blood that you were talking about?
Yeah.
Going back to Exhibit 42, there's no blood on the walls or on the bedding, correct?
On those walls and the bedding, correct.
Thank you. Sir, were you aware that the defendant's phone was found on the bed in the bedroom that night?
Yeah.
Sir, showing you this phone with this light brown case. Do you recognize this?
Yes.
Whose phone is it?
That was Lindsay's phone.
And is this the phone that she was consistently using between September of 2022 and... Well, actually August of 2022 throughout the fall and into January of 2023?
Yeah.
Can we have this marked as the next exhibit please.
It may be admitted.
Exhibit 47.
Sir, after making those observations in the bedroom, what did you do next?
I ran downstairs and went outside.
And do you recall whether you went out the front door or the back door?
I went out the back door.
So that would be the sliders, is that right?
Yeah.
And where did you go from there?
I just looked around in the backyard below that window and I saw Lindsay.
And where did you see her?
She was face up in the backyard.
And where in the backyard was she?
At the bottom of the window.
And so looking at Exhibit 38, you said this was the window, correct? The top right?
Correct.
Where was she in relation to that window?
Directly below it.
So down here by the window well?
Yeah.
For the record, I was pointing right below the bottom right window by the window well. I'm going to show you a photo of that window you were referring to. Is this the exterior view of that window to your bedroom that night?
Yeah.
We could have this marked as the next exhibit, please.
That may be admitted.
Exhibit 48.
I'm showing you Exhibit 48. So the window's open, correct?
Yes.
And the screen for the window is up, correct?
Yeah.
At any point in time that night or afterwards, did you notice that the screen was cut or broken in any way?
I didn't notice that, no.
And when you saw Lindsay on the ground there under the window, which direction was her body facing?
Her head was closer to the house. Her feet were away from the house.
Okay. And did you go to her?
Yeah.
And did you observe any injuries?
Yes.
And what did you see?
She had deep cuts on her wrists and she had a red line across her neck. I wasn't sure what it was at first, but she cut her neck.
And do you recall that these wounds weren't actively bleeding at the time?
I later learned that I said that on the 911 call.
And when you observed these wounds, is it correct that the 911 operator asked you or instructed you to apply pressure if needed?
I don't recall the whole call, but I believe that's probably true.
Okay. And you didn't at the time feel the need to apply pressure to any of those wounds, correct?
Correct.
Did you say anything to Lindsay when you found her in that state?
Yeah. I said, "What happened?"
And what was her response?
She said, "I tried to kill myself."
Did you ask her anything else?
I said, "Where are the kids?"
And what was her response?
She said, "They're in the basement."
And at that time, she didn't tell you that they needed help or they were in danger or they were injured, correct?
Correct.
And so you mentioned talking to someone on 911. At what point did you call 911?
I don't know the exact time, but it took a few minutes because my phone was switching between wifi and 911. So I almost just started calling out for the neighbors, but eventually it went through.
Okay. So you had some difficulty connecting, but eventually you connected to the 911 operator?
Yeah.
Okay. And did you stay on the phone with them while they were sending people to respond?
Yeah.
Okay. While you're on the phone with 911, are they asking you questions and you're responding with information about her condition?
Yeah.
Okay. And if you could just look at the screen here. Is this the model of the first floor of your home?
Yes.
Okay. And so we have here the sliding glass doors. Where would the basement door be in this model?
Directly below the stairs.
So now that it's flipped around, is this the door to the basement right here?
Yeah.
And for the record, that's the door across from the downstairs bathroom?
Yeah.
And then how long approximately? And I know you weren't looking at your watch or anything like that, but can you estimate for us how long it took for first responders to arrive?
Four or five minutes. Okay.
And during that time, are you continuing to try to talk to Lindsay?
Yeah.
Is she responding?
She's in and out of consciousness.
Okay. Was she breathing on her own?
I believe so.
Okay. And you're communicating information to the 911 operators and are they giving you advice on how to deal with the situation as it progresses?
Yeah.
Okay. Once emergency personnel arrive, what do you do?
I immediately got up and ran to the basement.
Okay. And do you still have the phone on you? You're still on the 911 call?
Yeah, I didn't realize it at the time, but I did.
Okay. And I'll have you look at this model here on the screen. Is this a fair and accurate depiction of the setup of your basement?
Yeah.
Okay. If you can just describe the rooms for us, what the purpose of each room was.
So the room in the back left was my office. The room with the black rubber mat is the gym. And then there's the living room to the right of that. And then the back right is just an area of the living room, and then there's a bathroom next to that.
So when you come down those stairs that night, which direction did you go?
Immediately went left.
And when you went left, what did you see?
I saw Cora.
And how did she look?
She had a band around her neck.
And was that an exercise band?
Yeah.
And do you recall what position she was in, whether face up or face down?
She's face down.
And when you saw her in that condition, what did you do?
I immediately ran over and tried to take the band off.
Were you able to get the band off?
Yeah.
And do you recall how you got the band off?
I think I untied it.
And when you say untied it, was it in a knot that you had to put everything down and unknot it or how was it tied?
I'm not sure I fully remember.
Do you recall describing it previously as when you initially tie your shoes, but then don't do the bow?
Yeah, that sounds right.
And was she responsive?
No.
And what did you see or do next?
I saw Callan.
And where was he?
He was next to her.
And how did he appear?
He had a band around his neck.
Sorry?
He had a band around his neck.
And did you remove that as well?
Yeah.
And do you recall what position he was in?
Same as Cora.
And looking at the model here, if you could just tell us where was Cora?
The left of the couch.
So would that be this area here that I'm pointing to in between the bureau and the couch?
Yeah.
And where was Callan?
To her left.
So would that be more over here towards the chair and the bureau?
Yeah.
After you removed the band from Callan's neck, what did you do next?
I tried to find Dawson.
And where did you go?
I looked...
And where did you go?
I looked in the bathroom and on the other side of the couch, and then I went to the other side of the basement and he was in my office.
And when you saw Dawson, what condition was he in?
I knew he was gone.
And did he also have a band around his neck?
Yeah.
And did you remove that band?
Yeah.
And looking at the office here, where was he located within the office?
Just to the left of the door when we went in.
Just in this area here, right inside the door?
Yeah.
If we may approach briefly.
Yeah, please.
Now, after finding Dawson and taking off the band, what happened next?
I think I was back and forth. I think I went to try to help Cora.
Okay. Did you try to give her CPR?
Yeah.
At some point in time, do the first responders make their way down to the basement?
Yeah.
And do they take over care of the children?
Yeah.
Where do you go?
They sent me upstairs.
Okay. And at this point, Your Honor, I'd move to submit the 911 call as the next exhibit.
It may be allowed pursuant to the earlier order.
... Cora, Dawson and Callan removed from the home and taken to a hospital?
Yeah.
Was that Beth Israel Deaconess in Plymouth?
Yeah.
Did you also go to that location?
Yeah.
And at the hospital, were you able to see your children?
Yeah.
And was Callan then transported to Children's Hospital?
Yeah.
Did anyone ever tell you not to leave your kids alone with Lindsay?
No.
In January of 2023, did Lindsay ever tell you that she wanted to harm your children?
No.
Did she ever tell you she was going to kill your children?
No.
A few days after this happened, did you receive a phone call from the defendant while she was at Brigham and Women's Hospital?
I think it was like a week or so after, yeah.
Okay. And what did the defendant say at that time about what had happened with the children?
She didn't talk about our kids. She talked about what she went through.
And what did she say about what she went through?
She said she heard a man's voice telling her that if she didn't do it now, she would lose her chance or something like that.
And did she also tell you that she had had a moment of psychosis?
I don't recall.
Did she mention the children at all during that call?
I don't think so. I mean, not directly.
Had she ever mentioned psychosis to you before?
No. I didn't know what psychosis was until after this happened.
Did she ever tell you she was hearing a man's voice before?
No.
If I may have a moment, Your Honor.
Sure.
I have no further questions for this witness.
All right.
I just have exhibits after.
All right. Counsel, can I see just briefly, sidebar?
The witness could be excused.
All right. Sir, you can be excused subject to recall at a later point today. Thank you, sir. All right. Commonwealth?
Your Honor, at this point, I would move to submit some evidence. First would be the clothing Cora Clancy was wearing the night of January 24th, 2023. First, the pajama pants, pajama shirt. And then the pink robe. We could have these marked as one exhibit.
All right. They may be admitted.
Exhibit one.
Thank you.
And then Dawson's clothing. We have dinosaur underwear for the record. And a gray T-shirt or shirt, long sleeve shirt. Have this as the next exhibit, please.
That may be admitted.
Exhibit two.
And then Callan's pajamas. As the next exhibit, please.
That may be admitted.
Exhibit three.
Yellow exercise band found with Dawson. Can have this as the next exhibit, please.
That may be admitted.
Exhibit four.
Black exercise band found with Cora. Could have this as the next exhibit, please.
That may.
Exhibit five.
And then the blue exercise band found with Callan. If you could have this as the next exhibit, please.
That may be admitted.
Exhibit six.
Your Honor, we would ask that the 911 call be played.
All right. All right. Members of the jury, I just kind of wanted to give you ... All right. Sometimes in a trial, evidence that is introduced that produces in jurors an emotional response. For example, it's understandable to feel sympathy and empathy when you hear or see certain evidence. But as jurors who have taken an oath to follow the law, I'm instructing you that the law says you must separate any emotional reaction on your part from the informational value and weight of the evidence. You must not be influenced in any way by the unpleasant nature of some of the evidence, including testimony, including exhibits. And so you must find the facts in this case based only on the evidence. So you can't find facts or base your decision on sympathy, anger, passion, or prejudice, or pity for or against either side. Rather, your verdict must be based solely on the evidence that is introduced in this case and my instructions and any other limiting instructions. And I'll go into that, but I just kind of wanted to remind you of that as we go through this. All right. At this point, we're going to play the exhibit, which is I believe the 911 call. Is that correct?
Yes, Your Honor.
All right. I want to remind everyone that there is a order entered by the court regarding this matter. It's not to be recorded, it's not to be broadcast, and it's not to be reproduced in any way subject to any sanctions that would go along with the violation of that court order. So I just want to remind everybody, and that order applies to the media and applies to the public. So I just kind of wanted to remind everybody in regards to that. So with that, Commonwealth.
Yep.
Jurors close your notebooks. Place them on the chairs. Follow me, please.
My [inaudible 01:29:09] go.
Jurors have exited the courtroom. The court's in session. Please be seated.
We'll be in recess at this time.
Thank you.
Court, all rise.
We're in recess. Please exit the courtroom. Get out the courtroom, please. Thank you.
(silence)
Your Honor, for the purpose of the record, we return back to the matter of Commonwealth v. Lindsay Clancy. All parties are present, including the defendant.
All right. Counsel, can I see you at sidebar, please? All right. We're going to take about a five- minute break. Then we'll come back out and I'll address the scheduling with counsel. All right. So about five-minute recess.
Court, all rise.
... the opening statement. Those were horrendous, much more horrendous than I thought they would be. They look horrible. And then she threw herself out of the window. She's paralyzed. Every single time I hear the court say, "All rise," I think about the fact she cannot. She cannot. She wasn't just saying, "I wanted to kill myself." She almost killed herself and now she's permanently disabled. So I mean, I mentioned this before we went back in, but I don't think they should have brought this case. I think the prosecution should have declined to prosecute and she could have been found civilly responsible here in terms of having her civilly committed. A court could have found that. She could have been committed to an institution because she's a harm to herself and she's a harm to others. She could have gotten treatment. This is not a criminal case in my mind. This is a case where they did everything they could to prevent this and yet tragically it did occur. And frankly, I hope they're successful on this civil side because I do think that the medical professionals failed her obviously, and hopefully they will recover there.
Yeah. And Kevin Reddington was right there with those photos after the Commonwealth's opening statement. He brought those babies out and said, "Really? This is superficial wounds? Take a look." Very effective. The drugs, the different versions, different doses of drugs that she was given by different medical professionals, it's something the defense is really leaning into saying, " Yes, postpartum depression, but it was accelerated by these drugs. And that's a huge part of the equation." Here's Reddington in his opening saying that she was given drugs that she should not have been given and everybody knows it, but yet she was given it.
After the second child, she had postpartum. You're going to hear evidence that that's one of the issues that is important because that could lead to bipolar. One of the things that you don't do, which is taboo, is if you have somebody that's bipolar, you don't put them on an antidepressant, you don't put them on Zoloft, you don't put them on what's called an SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. It messes with your brain. You don't do that, but it was done in this case.
How do the drugs factor in? And more importantly, during this cross, how will that theory come to life through Patrick Clancy?
I think Patrick is going to expand upon what he was trying to say on direct examination, which is, "Okay, she may not have finished the entire bottle, but it was subject to different doses. So she finished one bottle and then maybe started another bottle." So I think he's going to try to explain at least that issue.
Yep. Okay. You see they're back on the record there. Let's go into the courtroom, see if they're just going to wait for the jury or if there's anything else going on. Oh, looks like they're jumping back to a sidebar quickly before bringing in the jury. So let's use this opportunity, grab a commercial break and get you back into the courtroom. We expect Patrick Clancy to be back on the stand for cross-examination. We'll see. Stay with us.
Which ones do you want? All the exhibits are in that box. The prescription bottles are right here. Do you need those?
Court, all rise. Jurors enter. This court's now in session. Please be seated.
Your Honor, for the purpose of the record, we return back to the trial of Commonwealth v. Lindsay Clancy. All parties are present, including the defendant and the 18 jurors.
All right. Members of the jury, thank you for your patience with us. With that, Commonwealth, you would call your next witness, please.
Thank you, Your Honor. The Commonwealth calls Angela Krause.
Good morning. Stop right here and raise your right hand for the clerk.
Good morning. Do you solemnly swear that the testimony and the evidence you shall give to the court and the jury that are now standing between the Commonwealth and the defendant shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Thank you.
Watch your step right here, please, and have a seat?
Hey, good morning. Good morning.
Good morning. How are you?
I'm going to ask you to keep your voice up and speak into that microphone, please.
Okay.
All right. Thank you. Commonwealth.
Thank you, Your Honor. Good morning.
Good morning.
Could you please state and spell your name for the record?
It's Angela Krause. It's A-N-G-E-L-A K-R-A-U-S-E.
And your date of birth, please?
5/19/77.
Where do you work?
CVS Pharmacy.
And at which location?
Kingston.
Okay. And do you know the address of that location?
189 Summer Street.
And how long have you worked there?
Four years at that location.
And what is your role there?
General manager.
How long have you been the general manager?
For CVS?
For CVS, yes.
Nine years.
And so the entire time you've worked at that location, those four years, you've been the general manager at the Kingston store?
Yes, ma'am.
I want to direct your attention to Tuesday, January 24th, 2023. Were you working that day?
Yes, ma'am.
And what shift were you working?
Closing.
Which is what hours?
I'd say roughly 3:00 to 11:00.
So that would be 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM?
Yes, ma'am.
And I want to direct your attention further to 4:48 PM. Did you receive a phone call while you were working?
Yes, ma'am.
And was that on the CVS line?
Yes.
And do you know that number?
No.
Okay. And where were you when you received that call?
I was in the office.
Okay. And what were you doing?
Preparing to do cash for the night.
And what does that entail?
Closing out the registers.
Okay. And the call that you received, was that from a male or a female?
Female.
And what, if anything, did she say?
She was inquiring if I carried a product in stock.
And what product was that?
It was like a constipation medicine.
Was it MiraLax?
Yes.
And did she specifically ask for something to do with children's MiraLAX?
Well, I asked for clarification because depending on if she wanted children's or adults, it would be in a different part of the store.
Okay. And when you asked for clarification, was she able to provide clarification?
Yes.
And what-
Said it was for children's.
Okay. And what was your response?
It's located in two different places in the store.
Okay. And did you give her any specific brand names or anything like that?
I just said that we carried Pedia-Lax in aisles 13 and 20.
Okay. And approximately how long was this conversation?
A few minutes.
During that conversation, did you have any difficulty understanding the woman?
No, ma'am.
Did she appear to have any difficulty understanding you or the questions that you were asking her?
No, ma'am.
And her voice, did it seem slurred or impaired in any way?
Not at all. It's a very normal interaction.
I was just going to ask, was there anything out of the ordinary about the conversation?
No. No.
Later that evening, did the police come to the store?
Yes.
And did they request that you pull some surveillance footage for them?
Yes.
And did you do that?
Yes.
Okay. And if I could just have Exhibit 28, the footage up for a moment. If you could look at the screen here, do you recognize the store?
Yes.
And is this part of the footage that you provided to police that night?
Yes.
And directing your attention over here to the right, the aisle where the gentleman is standing, all the way to the right of the store, are you familiar with what was in that aisle in January of 2023?
Yeah, that's our children's aisle.
So that would have things like children's Pedia-Lax?
Yes, ma'am.
Did you have any interaction with-
Okay. Did you have any interaction with that gentleman while he was in the store?
No, ma'am.
Okay. And did the police also ask you to provide a copy of a receipt for that gentleman's transaction?
Yes, ma'am.
I'm just showing you exhibit 26. Is this the receipt that you provided to the police?
Yes, ma'am.
And on here it says "Skittles Wildberry." Would that be Skittles?
Yes.
It also says "FLT PDLX LQDGLY" for the second item. What does that stand for in CVS?
It's Fleet brand, but then it's going to be Pedia-lax, and then a glycerin suppository.
Okay, so the FLT is for Fleet?
Yes.
And the PDLX is for Pedia- lax?
Yes, ma'am.
I have nothing further for the witness. Thank you.
All right. Mr. Reddington?
I have no questions. Thank you, ma'am.
All right. Thank you, you may sit down. Thank you. Please.
Your Honor, the Commonwealth would call Saria Sweeney. Yeah, sure.
Come here.
It doesn't make a difference to me.
Good morning, ma'am. Can you stop right here and raise your right hand for the clerk, please?
Please raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear that the testimony and the evidence you shall give to the court and the jury in the matter now pending between the Commonwealth and the [inaudible 02:52:19] shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Yes.
Thank you.
This way, please. Watch your step right there.
Hey, good morning.
Good morning.
I'm just going to ask you to keep your voice up and speak in that microphone.
Sure.
Thank you.
Absolutely.
Yes.
Thank you, Your Honor.
[inaudible 02:52:37].
Thank you. Good morning. Could you please state and spell your name for the record?
My name is Saria, S-A-R-I-A. My last name is Sweeney or Shelgren, depending on what year we're in.
So in 2023, was your last-
It was Sweeney, S-W-E-E-N-E-Y.
And now, what is your last name?
Shelgren, S-H-E-L-G-R-E-N.
And what is your date of birth?
9/3/89.
And where do you work?
I currently have two jobs. I work at a doctor's office and I also work at ThreeV, it's a restaurant in Plymouth.
And how is ThreeV spelled?
It's spelled out the number three, T-H-R-E-E, with a V at the end.
And how long have you worked at ThreeV restaurant?
Since 2019.
And where is it located?
In Cordage Park, in Plymouth.
And in 2023, in January of 2023, what was your role at ThreeV restaurant?
I was a hostess then.
And directing your attention further, to Tuesday, January 24th, 2023, were you working that night?
Yes, I was.
And what shift were you working?
I work an evening shift. Usually, I would arrive between 4:45 and 5:00.
And when would your shift end?
Typically, between 8:00 and 9:00.
And what was your role as a hostess?
Greet patrons, take takeout orders, give takeout orders, seat people, generally help with the running of the restaurant front end.
And directing your attention to 5:10 P.M., did you receive a call for a takeout order?
Yes.
And was that a male or a female?
It was a female.
And did that person place an order?
Yes.
And do you recall what she ordered?
Yes.
What was that?
It was a order of risotto and a Mediterranean power bowl.
And the power bowl, is that considered a type of salad at ThreeV?
Yes.
Did you ask any follow-up questions about the order of the salad?
Yes.
What did you ask?
We ask, if it doesn't automatically come with protein, it's something that we always ask, "Do you want to add a protein?"
Does the Mediterranean power bowl automatically come with protein?
No, it does not.
So, did you ask the woman if she wanted protein?
Yes.
And what was her response?
"No, thank you."
And did she also give you the name and phone number of the person who would be picking up the order?
Yes.
Okay. And is that something that you enter into the system as you're entering the order?
Yes.
Did you have any trouble understanding the woman?
No.
Did she appear to have any trouble understanding you or the questions you were asking her?
No.
Did her voice sound slurred or impaired in any way?
No.
Was there anything out of the ordinary about this interaction?
No.
Directing your attention to 5:54 P.M., was the order picked up?
Yes.
And was it picked up by a male or a female?
A male.
If we could pull up Exhibit 30 footage. And are you depicted in the video here?
Yes.
And where are you?
I'm standing behind the host stand.
And so for the record, the hostess stand, or the host stand, is in the upper left-hand corner?
Yeah, it's that black stand. It has a wooden frame around the top.
So, am I pointing to the right area?
Yes.
In the upper left corner?
Yes.
If you could play that for a moment. And if you could pause it, please. So, we're at 5:54:19 P.M., You see the individual who picked up the order?
Yes.
And which individual is that?
The man in the dark jacket that entered last.
And is he the person behind the couple at the host stand?
Yes.
And showing you what's been marked as Exhibit 31, do you recognize this?
Yes.
And what do you recognize it to be?
That is one of our printouts that comes with orders. We attach those to the bags for takeout and have a copy for ourselves as well.
And displaying it. Here, in the line where it says "Patrick," and then a phone number, is that where you would enter in what the person calling gives you for the information of the person picking up the order?
Yes.
Was there anything out of the ordinary about your interaction with that gentleman?
No.
I have no further questions.
Attorney Reddington?
No questions. Thank you, ma'am.
All right. Thank you, ma'am. You may step down. Thank you. Watch your step, please. All right. Counsel, can I see you at this time? Thanks again, everyone. All right. Well, members of the jury, remember I said today was going to be full of a couple of starts and stops? This is going to be one of those stops, all right? So, what we're going to do, I'm going to excuse you till 2:00, all right, and then we're going to come back and we're going to resume, I believe, with the Commonwealth's case. So, we're going to be in recess on this matter till 2:00, all right?
Court, all rise. Jurors, close the notebooks, place them on your chairs, please. Jurors have exited the forum. This court's in session, please be seated.
All right. We're going to be in recess on this matter till 2:00. I want to remind everyone of the media order regarding not videotaping or broadcasting from the courtroom or inside the courthouse, so I just kind of wanted to reiterate that. All right, so with that, we'll be in recess till 2:00. Thank you.
Court, all rise.
We understand the defense is going to be able to use, as a direct examination, they'll be able to get out some of the more narrative questions that they may feel that he wants to share to this jury. The prosecutors in this case say that Clancy acted intentionally when she used those exercise bands to strangle her children in their home. The defense though, says she was a victim. She was suffering from postpartum psychosis. So, inside of this courtroom, these jurors have been hearing, after Patrick Clancy left the stand after his direct examination, from a CVS manager, the person who would've been one of the people who interacted with Patrick Clancy during that time the prosecutors say his wife sent him away so that she could carry out the killings. That testimony is done, and now another witness is taking the stand, so let's pick it up inside of that courtroom.
That doesn't make a difference to me.
Good morning, ma'am. Can you stop right here and raise your right hand for the clerk please?
Please raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear that the testimony of the evidence you shall give to the court and the jury in the matter now pending between the Commonwealth and the [inaudible 03:03:47] shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you God?
Yes.
Thank you.
This way, please. Watch your step right there.
Hey, good morning.
Good morning.
I'm just going to ask you to keep your voice up and speak in that microphone.
Sure. Absolutely.
Yes. [inaudible 03:04:05].
Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you. Good morning. Could you please state and spell your name for the record?
My name is Saria, S-A-R-I-A. My last name is Sweeney or Shelgren, depending on what year we're in.
So in 2023, was your last-
It was Sweeney, S-W-E-E-N-E-Y.
And now, what is your last name?
Shelgren, S-H-E-L-G-R-E-N.
And what is your date of birth?
9/3/89.
And where do you work?
I currently have two jobs. I work at a doctor's office and I also work at ThreeV. It's a restaurant in Plymouth.
And how is ThreeV spelled?
It's spelled out, the number three, T-H-R-E-E, with a V at the end.
And how long have you worked at ThreeV restaurant?
Since 2019.
And where is it located?
In Cordage Park, in Plymouth.
And in 2023, in January of 2023, what was your role at ThreeV restaurant?
I was a hostess then.
And directing your attention further, to Tuesday, January 24th, 2023, were you working that night?
Yes, I was.
And what shift were you working?
I work an evening shift. Usually, I would arrive between 4:45 and 5:00.
And when would your shift end?
Typically, between 8:00 and 9:00.
And what was your role as a hostess?
Greet patrons, take takeout orders, give takeout orders, seat people, generally help with the running of the restaurant front end.
And directing your attention to 5:10 P.M., did you receive a call for a takeout order?
Yes.
And was that a male or a female?
It was a female.
And did that person place an order?
Yes.
And do you recall what she ordered?
Yes.
What was that?
It was a order of risotto and a Mediterranean power bowl.
And the power bowl, is that considered a type of salad at ThreeV?
Yes.
Did you ask any follow-up questions about the order of the salad?
Yes.
What did you ask?
We ask, if it doesn't automatically come with protein, it's something that we always ask, "Do you want to add a protein?"
Does the Mediterranean power bowl automatically come with protein?
No, it does not.
So, did you ask the woman if she wanted protein?
Yes.
And what was her response?
"No, thank you."
And did she also give you the name and phone number of the person who would be picking up the order?
Yes.
And is that something that you enter into the system as you're entering the order?
Yes.
Did you have any trouble understanding the woman?
No.
Did she appear to have any trouble understanding you or the questions you were asking her?
No.
Did her voice sound slurred or impaired in any way?
No.
Was there anything out of the ordinary about this interaction?
No.
Directing your attention to 5:54 P.M., was the order picked up?
Yes.
And was it picked up by a male or a female?
A male.
If we could pull up Exhibit 30 footage, and are you depicted in the video here?
Yes.
And where are you?
I'm standing behind the host stand.
And so for the record, the hostess stand, or the host stand, is in the upper left-hand corner?
Yeah, it's that black stand. It has a wooden frame around the top.
So, am I pointing to the right area?
Yes.
In the upper left corner?
Yes.
If you could play that for a moment. And if you could pause it, please. So, we're at 5:54:19 P. M. You see the individual who picked up the order?
Yes.
And which individual is that?
The man in the dark jacket that entered last.
And is he the person behind the couple at the host stand?
Yes.
And showing you what's been marked as Exhibit 31. Do you recognize this?
Yes.
And what do you recognize it to be?
That is one of our printouts that comes with orders. We attach those to the bags for takeout and have a copy for ourselves as well.
And displaying it. Okay. Here, in the line where it says "Patrick" and then a phone number, is that where you would enter in what the person calling gives you for the information of the person picking up the order?
Yes.
Was there anything out of the ordinary about your interaction with that gentleman?
No.
I have no further questions.
Attorney Reddington?
I have no questions. Thank you, ma'am.
All right. Thank you, ma'am. You may step down. Thank you. Watch your step, please. All right. Counsel, can I see you at this time? Thanks again, everyone.
All right. They are taking a bit of a break, and we understand that that actually turns into an early lunch break for these jurors. So, let's bring back in our guest who is watching with us. We have trial attorney Terri Austin, who's been providing analysis on this case all day. Terri, it has been a difficult day for jurors, sometimes a lunch break is even more than that, and I think that's what's going to be the case today. They can't talk about what they just went through together as a jury, but sometimes a break is certainly necessary.
Exactly, and I think that's why the judge is giving them an early break. He's enabling them to take in what they heard and to get past it, because it was extremely emotional, and maybe that's why we have these two witnesses, the CVS witness, the ThreeV witness. Those are the people who saw Patrick Clancy before he ended up going home and finding his wife on the ground and his three children, who obviously were killed. But I do believe that there was a possibility to avoid these two witnesses altogether. You saw that Reddington did not cross-examine them. Both of them were short, they could have stipulated to this. If I'm sitting on that jury, I'm thinking, why are you wasting my time, prosecution, listening to what he ordered? I know she's trying to show that the defendant, Lindsay Clancy, knew what she was doing, it was planned, and it was organized. Frankly, I think that's something that even the defense could stipulate if he can get an expert to say you can be both psychotic and planned, and those two things are not mutually exclusive. So, maybe he doesn't want to admit that here, and maybe that's why he is allowing these people to go on, and didn't offer to stipulate, but I probably would've stipulated to that.
Well, let's talk about that, Terri, a little bit more, because actually, the defense attorney has tried to stipulate to things in this case and it has been rejected by the court or the prosecution. He wanted to stipulate to pretty much everything involving the death of these children. They didn't want the clothing to come in, the autopsy photos, the crime scene photos, the first responders who are going to be testifying to exactly what happened, because he has said during pretrial motions, "I would stipulate to all of this. We don't even have to have a guilt phase. She's admitting guilt. She's not admitting that she was not insane at the time, and we could just have a phase that focuses on her mental health. Was this psychosis something where she didn't understand right from wrong?" Do you think that that would've been the way to go, that the court should have agreed with him, but clearly, that didn't happen?
I think the prosecution has a right to make the argument. I saw that argument, that's when the prosecution got, in my opinion, a little snippy, saying, "Yes, I know the defense doesn't want to hear all this, but I have a right to bring on my case," which she does. But maybe what could have been done, I see why no one is going to agree, the judge is not, the prosecution is not, they're not going to agree that it's skip the guilt phase. But there could have been instances where these small minor witnesses aren't that necessary and do waste the time of the court, where the judge could have encouraged the prosecution to say, "Look, you can have an affidavit from each of these people. You can stipulate to what they're going to say. No one is objecting to the fact that they came." But she's got to put on her case. The judge is giving her leeway. And I think the defense, Reddington, is an amazing defense attorney. I think we've all been saying that, and I think he made the argument and the judge basically was not having it.
So, this witness definitely sets up something that these jurors are going to be going on soon, and that is a jury view. That's already been agreed to. The judge has ordered it, and so they are going to go to that CVS. They're going to go to ThreeV. They're going to go to the home. And right now, they have heard from the witnesses at those locations, so it's going to be important. That could be a reason, Terri, what do you think, as to why these people needed to come in and maybe stipulate to, or share with the jury, certain things to anchor them to these locations that they are going to be seeing in person?
Overkill, in my opinion, going to all three locations. Maybe going to the home. You have photos, you have 3D representations, and you heard Reddington argue, "You know, you're going to get to see all this and you're going to go to the scene." I would have, if I were the judge, said, "Yes, you can go to the house," but I don't think they need to go to the CVS. For what purpose? The defendant had nothing to do with the CVS. Patrick walked to the CVS. What are we going to see, where he walked and picked up the drugs? What difference does that make? And why are we going to the ThreeV? He picked up the food. There's no doubt that he picked up the food. Complete total waste of time. It's hard to get a jury to get on a bus, or however they're being transported, to make sure everybody gets out, to make sure that they all see the same thing, and to make sure no one goes off and sees something else. I mean, going to a scene is not the easiest thing in the world. I would've limited, had I been the judge, to just the home. And in fact, I may not have even done the home, but I do think the prosecution has a right to put on its case. The judge is being very careful, and he is allowing the prosecution to go forward and to prove their case, so that's why we're seeing three things.
No, I agree. The logistics of a jury view, not easy, not simple. It is an undertaking to get all of these different people. And there's 18 jurors that are going to be going to these different locations. They've got to be protected. There's got to be security. You've got to remove other people from these locations. I don't know if they're going to go into the ThreeV and into the CVS, but the prosecution says they want them to feel the distance, feel the amount of time that it took to get to these locations. I mean, this is probably why we have this six to eight-week trial, Terri, because we can already tell at the onset, the meticulousness and thoroughness that this prosecution is going to be taking in going through the facts of this case.
That's right. And I think that they could have gotten the time and the distance from a GPS. We know how long it takes. We can measure it out. We can present that. I don't think they need to go. What if it's raining? What if a juror doesn't want to mess up their hair? What if they're not feeling well? What if they can't walk? What if they have someone on that jury who has a disability and isn't able to maneuver as well? So, I think it's going to be very difficult to do all three. Obviously, the judge has allowed it. The jury knows that they're going to be viewing this. He's keeping them posted, in terms of timing. And who knows, maybe it'll add a little bit more depth as far as the prosecution is concerned, and maybe those jurors will be able to appreciate the time and the distance. But again, I would've argued it, just like we know Reddington did, and I would've objected to it because I think it's a waste of time. And I'm honestly thinking if I'm a juror, and I think some of these jurors may be thinking, why are we doing all of this? And that'll hurt the prosecution at the end of the day.
Yeah, the in-person looking at exhibits versus inside of the courtroom. Now, speaking of exhibits, you can, as our viewers know, they can look at those exhibits. We have them up on our website, so you can go to courttv.com to see the evidence gallery, and it's going to be updated every day. We are going to take a break while they are on that break inside of the courtroom. And when we come back, we're going to talk more about this case. We also will have a live interview with someone who is inside of that courtroom during the playing of that emotional 911 call that was blocked from the public, but it was very apparent just how heavy that evidence was. Don't go anywhere. Welcome back to Court TV Live, I'm Julia Jenae. And we are continuing our coverage out of Plymouth, Massachusetts, in the case against Lindsay Clancy, a mom on trial for killing her three kids. She does not deny that she did that, but her defense says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis at the time and should not be held criminally responsible. The first witness for the prosecution was one who broke all of our hearts, Patrick Clancy, the father and former husband of the defendant. And I want to bring in someone who was inside of the courtroom for the most emotional of moments that happened today. We have Director of Photography for Law and Crime and Court TV, Richie Morganson is with us, Morganstern rather, there in Boston, Massachusetts. Richie, thank you so much for joining us. I know you're on a lunch break at this time, so we certainly appreciate your time. You have been the eyes and ears in the courtroom for those moments where we have to go off the record. And I know it's difficult, even for us, as journalists, take us to the moment when that 911 call, I know the audio had to be turned down for the public, but you were still able to hear what was played.
Yes. Of course, after hearing it, I think it was a great idea that the public did not have to hear this. A lot of us have been doing this for a while, but today was something else. It wasn't necessarily all the moments of him crying out and screaming, it was sometimes those moments of silence, where he was trying to get himself together, where you could kind of just hear his soul being physically ripped out of his body. And you could just tell he knew that he wanted to save them, but at the same time, you could just hear how he was just kind of falling apart from each... He couldn't even speak a full word, speaking to dispatch, just trying to explain what was going on. And then you could just tell from the courtroom, members of the jury were breaking down. Obviously, Lindsay was breaking down. It was quite the show for emotion at that point.
Absolutely, and we can feel that. Thank you for describing it for us in that way. Because we're seeing now, the image that you were able to take during that, where the camera was pointed at Lindsay. And I understand there were even parts of this testimony where her attorney was holding her hand. The image we're seeing now, she's got both hands over her face, but did you see any change in emotion from her during that time that you had the camera pointed at her?
No. She wept-
... at her?
No, she wept and even after the judge had called recess, she was surrounded by her nurses and she was crying until the moment she was brought out of the room and I couldn't see her any longer.
You mentioned the jurors. My heart goes out to them because they are the ones in this courtroom that did not sign up for anything. They were chosen to fulfill their duty, their service, their civil service, and are having to be exposed to all of this. What was it like after the call was over? I know they were given a break, but did you notice anything? Did you notice them looking at Lindsay or looking at the gallery at all?
I think everybody had a moment to themselves. I think they were all feeling it personally. I'm pretty sure when they were choosing the jury, they selected some people that had children. So anybody that was a parent in that room was feeling that emotion at the moment. And I don't think they were actually directing any anger at anybody at that moment. They were feeling it. Some people red in the face with tears literally running down their eyes or running down their face.
I'm so glad that you're able to share the emotion of it. There was something that the judge told these jurors at the beginning to separate or be able to separate the emotion from the facts. The prosecution wanted to share this, even though Patrick Clancy didn't want to even be in the room for it, and he's the one who asked for it to not be shown to the public. Did you gather anything from it that you felt is actually helpful to understand whether or not Lindsay Clancy was having a psychotic break? We know from the motion about this particular call, the prosecution says you can hear how quickly the volume in his voice rises when he finds a child and goes down, then rises again when he finds another child, and they say that shows-
Oh.
Tell me, Richie, you're reacting to that. Tell me what that was like.
Yeah. Those are the moments where you really start to realize what's happening here because he's in disbelief, and he's frantically moving around the home and just discovering one child after the other. And he just saw his wife moments ago on the ground with a cut open, blood everywhere. And then he's realizing now that his children are gone and he's trying to save them. He's saying a bunch of stuff that's inaudible. I can't really understand everything he was saying because it was so broken up. But I don't think anybody really was able to feel anything other than the horror of the situation as it just crystallized to everybody's heart.
Could you hear Lindsay at all in this call? I know he was with her when he first made the call because he thought she was the one victim.
Yes, you could hear her in the background. Her voice was a little bit more muffled. I think she had some liquid or something in her throat because you could hear the gargling a little bit as she was doing her screaming and calling out.
Was anyone else unable to stay inside of that courtroom? We know Patrick did not want to be there. I know Lindsay has family that's there in the gallery. Did you see anyone else leave, leave before, leave during this call being played?
I was super sensitive to making sure I wasn't going to capture anything that wasn't supposed to be captured. The only person I saw leave was Patrick.
All right. And you've been doing an incredible job, Richie. It's one of those cases that we even tell ourselves as colleagues, "Take care of yourself," because these are some very heavy issues and heavy information that's coming out inside of that courtroom. Another layer of that was the exercise bands that were shown inside of the courtroom today. Patrick Clancy understandably did not want to be there for that. Did you notice anything about that moment inside of the courtroom?
You could tell at that moment the tension was really starting to build again. It's one thing to hear it and visualize it, but when you saw the bands come out, you have a whole new understanding of that moment and what he was going through. When he said they were tied in a certain way where you were tying your shoelace, but minus the bow, I think it just locked in to everybody. And you really start to wonder yourself what is going on in her mind when she that?
And I want to let our viewers know that this could be one of the reasons, not could be, they put it in their motion, and it's one of the reasons that the prosecution wanted to bring this evidence to the jury, even though it's so devastating to hear, even though it may hurt more than help in terms of moving the case for her being not insane and not, they say that she is criminally responsible. But they say those exercise bands were tied in a certain way. And you mentioned it tied like a shoelace the first time and not the second time. And that his voice, the swiftness in which we're hearing the wails of when he finds the children, that shows, and this is the most horrific part of it all, that she would have held the exercise band for a long period of time, that it wasn't a situation where she double knotted it and left. I mean, those details that these jurors have to take in, they are difficult, but they are important. According to the prosecution, they say that can help these jurors determine whether this was someone who was cold and calculated and committed premeditated murder or someone who was in the throes of a psychotic break. So do you think that that was clear for the jurors or did that emotion feel so heavy that it's hard to even get through those facts even though the judge told them they need to pay attention to the facts?
Yeah, I question it myself as far as the order of witnesses because now they've been hit so hard with the emotional aspect of it that they're probably trying to logically think of how this came together in her mind. And I think the rest of the trial defense is going to be able to just start to give that character of her and how she was in not the right frame of mind. And I think that the prosecution's going to have a tough time really trying to bring everybody back to that emotional state to where they were feeling those types of feelings. So I'd wonder myself why they did it in that order and how the jury's going to react once we start bringing in some actual experts in medical and psychological evaluation.
Are we getting a sense of whether Patrick Clancy is coming back today? It wasn't necessarily said on the record. Are you hearing anything there in the courtroom about his cross-examination?
I would actually be surprised if he came back today, but I did not hear anything else. It does seem like the state does have some more witnesses lined up for the remainder of the day.
All right. Richie Morganstern, thank you so much for joining us and for sharing all of that. It's illuminating for us. You're doing a wonderful job for us, so we really appreciate everything that you're being able to bring to our viewers. We'll let you get back inside of that courtroom. We have to take a break, but we have more of the Clancy trial coming up after this.
They were strangled, deliberately and meticulously killed by this defendant on January 24th of 2023.
I suggest to you that the issue of consideration is what was going on in that woman's mind.
This was a woman who acted intentionally, rationally, and swiftly to accomplish a very specific goal. To kill.
This is a woman that was suffering from psychosis at the time that she went down to that basement.
She drew her husband out of the house, their father, so that she had the opportunity and the time to carry out these murders.
This is the young woman that, with her husband, who tried very hard to get the help she needed.
Welcome back to Court TV Live. We are following day two of the case against Lindsay Clancy. You saw there some of the clips from the opening statements. And today these jurors heard some of the most emotional and horrific evidence that they're going to see in this trial. That is through the testimony of the ex-husband of the defendant who's also the father of these three children. Right now, court is on a lunch break. So the jurors are taking a break. It may take a little longer than normal in a case where they have seen such difficult testimony and evidence that they have heard play inside of that courtroom. But once they reconvene, we will take you there live back inside of that Plymouth County, Massachusetts courtroom. While we wait, we are going to take a look back at the timeline of this case because it is important. The prosecution absolutely wants these jurors to feel every moment of what they say was a crime. The defense says she doesn't bear criminal responsibility because of her mental state. So here's a look at some of the major time points of this case. At 4:02 PM, the defendant, according to the prosecution on the day in question, searched for, quote, "Kids Miralax" on her phone. And then at 4:13 PM, she searches, "Take out ThreeV." So the restaurant, we just heard from a hostess from ThreeV. About 30 minutes later, she called CVS and talked with someone about children's Miralax. So again, this is someone that prosecution has brought to the stand, brought the manager so that they could talk about being inside of that store at the time. 4:53 PM, there was a text to Patrick asking him if he wanted takeout from ThreeV. And then there are calls at 5:10 PM. ThreeV, Lindsay speaks to the hostess to place an order. That hostess took the stand to say she seemed like nothing was out of the ordinary. It seemed like a normal call. And the order is placed for 5:15 PM and that's when Patrick leaves the house. He's seen on surveillance video just about 10, 15 minutes later at CVS first. Patrick calls Lindsay because he's trying to figure out making sure if he has the right prescription. She doesn't answer. Then she calls him back and tells Patrick exactly what medicine to get. He has said that she did not seem out of the ordinary. Nothing alarmed him about how she sounded on the phone. At 5:37, he made that purchase at CVS. 5:54, he then picks up their takeout from ThreeV. Remember, he left home at 5:15. So once he arrives home, it's 6:09 PM. Less than an hour has passed, but he arrives home and that's what these jurors heard inside of the courtroom. The 911 call of his discovery of first his wife outside on the lawn, and then each of his children inside the basement of their home. Let's bring back in trial attorney Terri Austin, who's been analyzing this case for us. Terri, in the reading of that timeline, is there anything that stands out to you that may be helpful to this jury in any way in determining criminal responsibility?
Well, it's a very condensed timeline, like you said. I mean, it's 45 minutes. It's less than an hour between the time he left the home and got back from the CVS and picking up the food. And I think what the prosecution is trying to show here is that this was very planned. We know that the defendant sent Patrick out to pick up the drugs for her little girl, for Cora, and to pick up the food for all of them. She ordered the food. There was no problem. We saw the two witnesses from, one from CVS and one from ThreeV Restaurant. They all said that she sounded perfectly normal on the phone. So they are trying to show that this timeline means this was planned. This was intentional. She took just enough time. She mapped it out. She knows how long these errands are going to take, and that she murdered her children. This was intentional, premeditated, planned murder. I think what we're going to have to see on the defense side, Reddington is going to have to make sure when he does the cross-examination of Patrick Clancy, whenever he comes back on that stand, that it's clear there was no idea that anything was going to happen. Clearly had Patrick Clancy thought something was going to happen, he would not have left. He would have had the parents come. He would have had her institutionalized. He would have stayed by her side. And I think what the medical experts are going to have to say to support the theory that this was psychosis is it's possible for her to plan this out, to have dinner, et cetera, and still have these voices in her head telling her that she has to kill the children. And this was something to save the children she had to do, whatever the voice was and whatever it said, that she couldn't control herself. Remember, under the law in Massachusetts, it's a two-pronged approach. There's cognitive and there's volitional. She has to show that she was not aware of her wrongfulness and she wasn't able to conform herself to the requirements of the law. So those are the things she's going to have to show, and the medical experts are going to have to come in and defend her in this case.
Terri, you're mentioning voices, you're mentioning psychosis, and that reminds me of something that stood out to me in Patrick's testimony today. He was asked about visiting his wife after this incident, talking to her on the phone or being able to communicate with her, and that she used the word psychosis. And the prosecutor asked, "Have you ever heard her use the word psychosis before?" And he said, "I didn't know what psychosis was until this happened." Talk about that because when we go through a trial like this that is so difficult in terms of the details, but he had been through all of this with his wife, the anxiety, the postpartum depression, but he hadn't heard anything before about psychosis. It can sometimes be a trial like this where someone for the first time is understanding what that even means.
Well, that's exactly right. And it's not as though... Look, we can't predict when a psychotic episode is going to occur. If we could, we wouldn't have any psychotic episodes. We'd do something to prevent it from happening. I think one of the weaknesses in this case is the fact that Patrick wasn't told every single little thing about the medications. He wasn't told every single thing about what she was going through. He'd not heard the word psychosis. But you know what? Maybe Lindsay Clancy didn't know it was psychosis. Maybe after this happened, she was cognizant enough to figure out, "Well, I don't know what happened. My God, how could I have done this?" And then she figured out she was going through a psychotic break or perhaps she talked to some of the doctors that she was dealing with when she was put into the hospital. So it's very difficult to know exactly what is going on as you're going through it. They are not medical experts. The medical experts are the ones who are going to have to help them through this psychotic break. And I'm not surprised that he never heard that word. And I don't think she was aware of what was going on. Frankly, I think if she knew she was going to have a psychotic break, this would not have happened. Both of them did the best they could, in my humble opinion, to avoid anything like this happening.
Yeah. The prosecution is certainly pushing back on that and using that part of the testimony to try and suggest that her attorneys told her that word. But Kevin Reddington has said that that is absolutely not the case. He didn't supply the defense to his client that early on in this case. We're going to keep talking about it. Terri, please stand by. When we come back, we are going to check in, see if they're back from that lunch break, and break down more that is happening ahead in this case.
Duxbury, Massachusetts, a quiet seaside town was shattered by an unthinkable tragedy. Lindsay Clancy, a young nurse, devoted wife, and mother of three, was seen as the picture of perfection. But police say behind the smiles in family photos, darkness took hold. On a cold January night, investigators say she strangled her children, Cora, Dawson, and baby Callan. All that before attempting to take her own life. Clancy's husband, Patrick, returned home to a scene of unimaginable horror. Now, the once trusted nurse faces murder charges as her defense claims she suffered from severe postpartum psychosis. Prosecutors call it calculated. Her attorneys say it's a symptom of a mind lost to illness.
A husband's testimony is on pause inside of a Plymouth County, Massachusetts courtroom. The Lindsay Clancy trial continues as both sides battle over one central issue, criminal responsibility. And we are still waiting to hear when her ex-husband and the father of the three victims in this case, Patrick Clancy, is going to be returning to the witness stand. His direct examination seems to be over, but we anticipate there is going to be cross-examination coming soon. Right now, they're on that lunch break. Here's a live look inside of the courtroom. And once they come back from that lunch break, we will take you back into the courtroom. We understand from the photojournalist that's there inside of the courtroom for us, Richie Morganstern, he says that it seems like the state has many witnesses lined up for the rest of the day. So there's a possibility that Patrick may not return to the stand as anticipated. While we continue to wait, let's bring back in our guest who is watching along with us, trial attorney Terri Austin, who's been helping us break down exactly what these jurors have to decide. It is a difficult one. It's not, do they believe that she did it? Do they believe that she is the exact reason for the deaths of her children? They've got to determine whether she was legally sane and understood her actions when it happened. You broke it down wonderfully, Terri, earlier, but I want to ask you this. How as either a prosecutor or a defense attorney, how do you keep these jurors thinking about that very narrow part of this? It's outside of the horror of it all. It's outside of even all of the medication. You've got to keep them on task of did she understand or appreciate the criminality of her actions? And if not, then they can find her guilty.
I think we're going to see the defense do more of that. Right now, the prosecution is being fairly broad in the presentation. I think going through the timeline, obviously you have to make sure the jury understood what was going on, particularly as it relates to that day. And so I think the prosecution is trying to lay out what occurred and trying to point out from a timeline perspective that the defendant knew what she was doing, she knew it was wrong, and that she could have conformed her conduct. What I think we're going to see the defense say is, "Look, there is no argument that this happened." And I think he's going to try to get that out through his cross-examinations when he finally does do the cross-examination of Patrick Clancy and through other cross-examinations that we're going to see of the prosecution's case. But during closing arguments, I definitely think that Reddington is going to focus on the question here, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, is whether or not it was someone who could appreciate that what she was doing was wrong and could she conform her behavior? And if not, if you believe and you listen to our medical experts and we had these medical experts who got up there and they testified and you heard them say that it's possible she could have this postpartum, not only depression, but psychosis, she could be hearing the voices in her head and not able to conform her behavior, not understand that what she's doing is wrong, and planning this because that is what the voice is telling her to do. A psychosis is hallucinations. It's delusion. You've got to have those medical experts. And I think that we're going to see more of that when we see the defense case and certainly when we see the defense closing.
Is it a problem that Patrick Clancy on the stand said that he didn't remember his wife ever saying that she was hearing voices before this happened?
It's funny because when he said that, I thought that I had heard somewhere, I don't know if it was during one of the openings or whether or not it was in the GoFundMe or whether the New Yorker magazine, but I thought I had heard somewhere that he did hear that she had some thoughts of both suicide and harming the children. But I think the question that was asked, if I'm not mistaken, by the prosecution, was in January of that year. She made it a specific timeframe. So I think that's why we're hearing some inconsistencies. I saw some of the comments actually on your YouTube channel, and I think some of the viewers are confused. I think what the prosecution was trying to get at is beforehand in January, did you know that she had these tendencies? And I think he did not know that in January. He did not know that prior to coming and going to the store and leaving her by herself.
Right.
He may have heard it another time.
January.
But not-
He heard it back in September, maybe even November, I think, when she started the [inaudible 03:54:35] type drug. But I was asking specifically about voices though, because I think the prosecution is trying to thread that needle. She didn't necessarily say a male voice was telling her to do things, and that hasn't come out in the evidence yet until after. When he talked to her, when she was hospitalized, that's when she told him that the reason she did it was because a man's voice told her, "You're going to run out of time. You have to do it now, basically, or else." Does it matter that he didn't know that particular part? He did say that she had thoughts of harming herself and even harming the kids prior to.
Right. I think that it's a slight weakness in the defense case that he didn't know more. I mean, if you think about the whole timeline back September, January, right before it happened, the more he knows, the better it looks for the defense, because it means that Lindsay is sharing things with him. It means that she's not hiding anything. It means that they're together trying to make sure that nothing untowards happens to either Lindsay or those children. So I think there's going to be some forgiveness here that he doesn't remember exact times of when she said what she said. And I don't think that's a big point that is going to be held against the defense, but it is a weakness in their case. Look, they don't have a burden of proof here. Obviously, prosecution has the burden of proof here, but I don't think that they're going to be able to show that she was criminally responsible for this case. I mean, it's a shifting burden here. It starts out with obviously you're saying, and then you have to show from a defense perspective that you have some mental illness, but then it's back on the prosecution from a burden standpoint to show that she was criminally responsible. I don't think they have enough here. And I think the little holes they have, one being that he's not sure of the timing of when she told him what exactly about the medication or her psychosis or her illness. I don't think that's a big enough problem that it will hurt the defense.
Yeah. In Massachusetts, the prosecution has that burden to show that she is not insane or that she didn't appreciate the criminality versus the defense, which is that way in some jurisdictions. Terri, before we have to go, can you react to what we heard from Richie Morganstern when he talked about what it was like inside of that courtroom for the 911 call?
I saw the photos of her, obviously, her crying, holding both the hands. It's got to be really difficult for that jury to not only hear and see and listen to that 911 call, but to watch her. I mean, this is not a malingerer. This is not someone who's faking. Frankly, I think she should be on suicide watch 24/7. So hearing the 911 call was difficult for those jurors and difficult for our photographer and anyone who heard it. But it was devastating for her. She regrets this till the day she dies, I'm telling you. And I think that that's going to... I mean, obviously you hear the judge talk about charging the jury and instructing them, "Don't let sympathy... Just look at the facts, just look at the law." But I do think it's going to affect that jury that she is being so genuine in the 911 call.
It is certainly a difficult day for everyone involved. Terri Austin, thank you for helping us understand things a lot more. We've got to get to our break. When we come back, more coverage of the Lindsay Clancy trial.
Coming-
Welcome back to CourtTV Live. I'm Julia Janae. Thank you for being with us this Wednesday afternoon where we are in the state of Massachusetts. Did Lindsay Clancy know what she was doing when she killed her children? We are watching her trial play out. Here's a live look inside of the courtroom. The jury remains on their lunch break and testimony is going to start up again soon. We don't know who's going to be on the stand next. Now, before the break though, emotions boiled over as the 911 call was played for the jurors, but not the public.
[inaudible 04:02:57].
Jurors have exited the courtroom. The court's in session. Please be seated.
We'll be in recess at this time.
Thank you.
Court all rise.
We're in recess. Please exit the courtroom. Way out the courtroom, please. Thank you.
That was the moment after the 911 call was played. Lindsay Clancy's reaction to it, we understand from people who are inside of that courtroom that she was sobbing throughout the playing of that 911 call. You even noticed there, she has attendants who are with her because she is still in a hospital. That's where she is housed after she comes back to the courtroom and leaves the courtroom for the day. She has two attendants, two nurses who are there to basically check on her to make sure that she's okay during this trial. The prosecution says that this former labor and delivery nurse, that was her job, that she was rational and that she was methodical. But her attorneys say no, she was in the midst of a severe mental health crisis when little Cora, Dawson, and Callan died. Earlier today, Patrick Clancy was on the stand and he detailed for these jurors what he discovered that day. Prosecutor had him to go through each and every room of his house that he went to, what he noticed first on his wife, then when he noticed his son, his next son, and his daughter. And he kept his composure throughout much of that testimony, and as was agreed to by these parties, he left so that he did not have to hear that 911 call, see the clothes that his children were wearing that day, or the exercise bands that were used in the death. We are continuing to wait for court to start up again, so let's bring in our panel of guests to talk about where we are in this case and whether or not the prosecution is going to be successful, especially in a claim that there was some malingering or faking by the defendant. Joining me now to discuss criminal defense attorney Jo-Anna Nieves is with us, and former deputy public defender in LA County, Philip Dube here as well. It is great to see you both. It is a difficult day for these jurors. Philip Dube, I'll start with you. What stands out to you the most about today versus the first day, which was difficult as well for them, where they had to listen to the beginning from Patrick Clancy?
First of all, it's such a pleasure to be on with Jo-Anna. She has great legal acumen. Honestly, she's terrific. Okay. Morning, afternoon, wherever you are. I'll tell you what stands out to me. This poor jury has to sit through some pretty tedious, monotonous, in my opinion, irrelevant testimony about someone's demeanor in a drug store. And by the way, I though it was a missed opportunity not to cross-examine those clerks and the store manager. The reason why is I think they could have made hay out of their lack of training. I don't want to disparage or downgrade the duties and obligations and job description of people who work in a CVS pharmacy, but make no mistake about it, they are not trained in recognizing psychosis, hallucinations, delusional disorder. They're there just to ring up sales and reconcile the books at the end of the day and make sure the shelves are stocked. So I would have said something like, for example, "You didn't get any training, for example, in nursing school, in medical school to take this job. You're not familiar with the outward symptoms of certain disorders." And certainly not everybody coming into the drug store is exhibiting symptoms. So for example, "Did you ever have anybody in line vomiting that needed medication?" So if you haven't seen that kind of stuff, you don't know how to recognize forms of psychosis and delusional disorder. And then the jury's going to be looking at the prosecutor asking themselves why do they even call these people to the stand? Because in the end, it'll make it look like they're simply incompetent to recognize the symptoms of the mentally ill. So that's how I would have played it. So I think the prosecution's case fell short with those witnesses.
Yeah, the restaurant hostess said she didn't hear anything out of the ordinary from Lindsay Clancy when she put in the order. Jo-Anna Nieves, this is a situation where the judge has told these jurors that you need to set aside your emotions even though this is indeed emotional. You need to be able to look at the facts. This was before the children's pajamas, the clothes that they were wearing that day, were shown to the jury. Is it even possible for them to set aside a day like today, which is rife with emotion?
I don't think it's possible, Julia. I mean, that's what this case is all about and that's what the prosecution is hinging their whole case on, the emotion and the atrocity of it all, just that impact of the death and loss of these three young children. And they're really depending on how it affects the jury in order to lay the foundation of their case. We're not in that courtroom, and just as bystanders hearing and seeing the reactions, I know I'm having an emotional reaction to it all. I don't know how you're able to keep it together, seeing every little bit of this. So I think that it's not a real possibility to just remove emotion altogether. And another thing I wanted to mention was with these witnesses that they called, Patrick did not observe what was going on because, like Philip was mentioning, she's not qualified to do so. Even though he's there day in and day out, these witnesses testified that, no, there was nothing abnormal about the call. And similarly, he likely saw nothing abnormal about her behavior that day. And he's taking a lot of heat for not doing more. And I just wanted to point out that the lack of noticing this is not uncommon, whether you're working in a store, a restaurant, or picking up food at the request of your wife.
Oh yeah, absolutely. I want to shift gears to another topic that I hear coming up. It's kind of threaded through the prosecution's case so far, and I'm wondering if I'm going to hear it more, and I'm happy to get you all's opinion on whether or not you think this is the route that they are taking. And that has to do with whether or not they think that, or they're going to tell this jury that Lindsay Clancy was faking symptoms or even faking her own the taking of her life, the attempt to take her own life. We heard through the testimony of Patrick Clancy today that she had these cuts on her neck and on her wrists. And the prosecution spent time asking him questions, which you could feel that he did not want to be answering a lot of these questions, but they wanted to know whether or not he saw any blood coming from the cut on her neck. And he said, "It could have been, I can't even remember." And they kept asking, "Did you have to put pressure on it? Didn't the 911 operator say if there's a cut on her neck, put pressure on it, you didn't do that, you didn't feel it was necessary." Where are they going with this, Philip, when they suggest that those cuts, it sounds like that's what they are suggesting to this jury, that they were superficial in nature. Do you think that's what they are suggesting, first of all?
Oh, of course, because they're not deadly wounds. I mean, if they were deep enough and she had completely exsanguinated, then that would make sense. But the fact that they're so superficial, it doesn't really show an intent to end one's life. But the real question then is what purpose would it serve other than attention getting? It's almost like a form of factitious disorder, sort of like the converse of Munchausen by syndrome. I'm sorry, Munchhausen by proxy syndrome, where you're inflicting injury on others for adulation and getting people help. But when you're doing it to yourself, it's almost like an attention getting device. So I don't know where the prosecution is going with it. Maybe Jo-Anna can weigh in on it, but I'm not seeing the relevance of it, frankly.
Yeah, Jo-Anna, give me your opinion on this. Is that what they are suggesting to this jury?
I definitely think it's what they're suggesting, but it's a big ask to get the jury to believe that she saw one, two, three, four, five different providers, she was actually prescribed medication, she was seeking out treatment, she did an outpatient type program and that she was confiding in her husband, and all of this was for this long con of setting up this fake suicide just so she could kill her kids and get away with it. I think it's just a big ask to digest that kind of theory.
We've got a clip from the prosecution's opening statement where they really give two reasons as to why she jumped out of the window. Let's listen to that and then talk about it.
After only four months in treatment, she made a choice, a deliberate and intentional decision that she did not want to try anymore. And because no one could take care of her kids the way she wanted them to, she had to take them with her. She drew her husband out of the house, their father, so that she had the opportunity and the time to carry out these murders. She maintained the ability to control her conduct, conform her conduct when she attempted to kill herself to escape the consequences.
So Philip, we're hearing there on one point, the prosecution is saying that she wanted to take them with her, suggesting this was a murder suicide and that she had a plan even before taking the lives of her children, but then they say that she was trying to escape the consequences by jumping out of the window. Is that two things that they're giving to this jury, and how problematic is that if they are doing that?
It makes no clinical or legal sense. How would she benefit either way? If the end game would be to end the lives of the children and herself, how is that perpetrating a fraud or engaging in some type of a con? It makes no sense. And it makes it look like they're desperate and they're looking for some type of motive or explanation for what she did. And in the end, what it really shows is how obtuse their thinking is in terms of the effects of PPP, the effect that it has on the mind and the body. So hopefully the experts will set the Commonwealth straight and let them know that they just don't frankly know what on earth they're talking about.
And Jo-Anna, it seems like they are trying to give this jury a motive. And I think the jury would want to know a motive. If this isn't legal insanity, then what was the reason?
Yeah, and I think in every case, everybody wants to understand what was going through their head at the time that this crime was committed. And that really is the crux of this case. Was she in touch with reality or not? What was she thinking? Did she appreciate the wrongfulness and was she able to comport herself as required by the law? And I think that what the prosecution could have done here is really weave a lot of the anticipated expert testimony that they're going to put on that would contradict the defense's testimony in their opening statements. So kind of highlight what we would be expecting to hear from these experts that would support the claims that they're making that all of this calculation and deliberation is not something you would see in an organized fashion from somebody who is actually experiencing psychosis. I think they are opening, did just kind of generally touch on subjects, but it would have laid the groundwork for the direction that we're seeing them go right now.
Philip and Jo-Anna, stand by, we've got to slip on a break, but when we come back, we're going to talk more about this case. They are still on a lunch break, but there's still something that's up in the air. What is going to happen when Patrick Clancy takes the stand again? He still has not finished his cross-examination. It hasn't even started yet. So we'll talk with our guests about what the defense should do on cross.
(silence)
Excuse me. I'm going to approach you, sir, with this document and just ask if you can recognize the handwriting?
Yeah, that looks like her handwriting.
Looks like Lindsay's handwriting?
Yep.
So I'm going to [inaudible 05:25:38].
Any objection?
Yes.
All right, if I could see counsel.
Bit of an objection there. So they're going on sidebar. Let's bring back in our guests who are standing by. We have with us Joanna Nieves, who's watching along with us. Joanna, Patrick is back on the stand. What are you picking up on with cross-examination now? Does he seem a little bit more relaxed than he did on direct examination?
Can you see that, Mr. Clancy?
Yeah.
No, not really. I think this is probably a very difficult thing for him no matter who's asking the questions. I think he did a really great job of staying composed for the most part on direct. And so-
You see the first word? What's the date? If you can read it. I can't.
It says May 11th, 2015.
And does that indicate, would that, to your knowledge, be around when she started working as a labor delivery nurse?
I thought she started a little early, but I'm not sure.
You see the name of the little girl that was born on that date that was her first delivery?
Yeah.
What's the name?
It's Cora.
And is that the reason you guys named Cora Cora?
It was, yeah.
Can you tell the jurors, as a husband living with Lindsay over the years, what kind of a mother was she?
She was very dedicated. She did everything. She started reading them books at three months and she made up songs for them. I remember she used to make Green Eggs and Ham for Cora because she liked that book.
Is that one of the Dr. Seuss books?
Yeah. She brought them to music classes.
You're quite the musician yourself, isn't that right?
I play a few instruments, yeah.
You play guitar?
Yep.
In your home, one of the things that appears to be striking is that almost every room, other than maybe a, well, actually a bedroom, but was dedicated to children. Would you agree with that?
Yeah.
But you didn't have a fancy dining room, right?
We did not, no.
What did you have in the dining room?
We had the table that I grew up with.
How about stuff on the wall in the different rooms, did she put things, wall hangings on the walls for the kids?
There was a lot of art projects, stickers, things like that.
Were they hanging from the wall?
Yeah.
One of the photographs that the government had. [inaudible 05:28:36].
[inaudible 05:28:36]. Oh, yeah.
Was photograph that... Excuse me. If you can identify for us, is this photograph a fair and accurate depiction of one of your rooms?
Yeah.
And what room would that be?
That's the playroom.
[inaudible 05:28:56] this room?
Any objection?
No.
All right. That may be admitted.
Exhibit 58.
Thank you.
If I may put Exhibit 58 up so the jurors in the zone can see it. There's some kind of like, looks as though it's boxed out window. So are we standing in the kitchen looking into that room through that boxed out window?
Yeah.
And all those objects, obviously, they're in that room would be kids' toys and things of that nature, right?
Right.
Do you recognize this photograph as being just a sample or sampling of the kids' rooms?
Yeah.
Do you know which room that was?
I think it was Dawson's.
Okay. [inaudible 05:29:50].
Any objection?
No.
All right. That may be admitted.
Exhibit 59.
All right. Thank you.
This one here has a bunch of stickers. It's got Bruce Lightyear or whatever his name is over to the right, and it's got an alphabet, A, B, C, D, things of that nature, correct?
Yeah, it's PAW Patrol.
Okay. And again, following through on that same theme, you recognize this photograph as well being another portion of that wall?
Yeah.
And what are those? Decals?
Yeah, they're just big stickers.
Okay. In the interest of time, Your Honor, I would just say you also identified this as being one of the kids' walls. Would that be what you were telling us would be art projects?
Yeah.
And they were hanging on the wall?
Correct.
Who hung them on the wall?
I think Lindsay did.
And would she also take hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of pictures of the kids?
Yeah.
Do you recall her putting together a little collage saying newborn, one month, two months, three months, four months, and then hanging that on the wall?
Yeah, she did it for each kid.
And which child was that?
That one's Dawson.
Dawson. Did you have occasion to see her interact with Dawson as a [inaudible 05:31:25]?
Hey, did you wish to introduce those photographs?
[inaudible 05:31:28]. Thank you. I appreciate it. [inaudible 05:31:36].
Exhibit 60 and 61.
Okay. Thank you.
Can you describe for the jurors her relationship with Dawson? I know he was a little kid, but I mean, to your observation, did she love Dawson?
She loved Dawson very much.
Did she resent him?
No.
You are familiar with, as her husband, Lindsay's, let's say, use of social media such as Facebook, right?
Yes.
Can you tell us, would you look at her Facebook a lot and pictures that she would post?
To be honest, no, not really.
Okay. Were you able to identify any of her postings on Facebook?
Probably.
Okay. Representative over the years or the period of time, I'm going to ask if you can identify this particular Facebook.
Your Honor, if we may approach briefly.
Sure. Yeah. Counsel.
Exhibits 63 through 75.
Mr. Clancy, and if I ask a question and it's difficult or if you need a break, I'm sure that [inaudible 05:39:30] we'll certainly give you a break. If I push too hard, just let me know. All right?
Yeah, yep. Appreciate it.
Okay. So again, just representative of the Facebook postings that Lindsay would post as the mother of your children, this, for example, would be July of 2018. Can you tell the jurors who that would be?
That's Cora.
[inaudible 05:39:56].
Moving...
Moving forward, say June of 2021. Can you tell us who that...
That's Cora and Dawson.
Okay. Again, the end of July 2021.
That's us with Cora and Dawson.
Okay. August 2021.
Dawson.
Okay. End of August 2021.
It's Cora and Dawson.
August, again, of '21?
It's Cora and Dawson.
December one of '21.
It's Cora and Dawson.
Is that first day of preschool?
Yeah.
September of '21.
That's Lindsay and Cora.
And was that some kind of like a family fun day, if you recall, where there was a box of things for kids to get in?
Yeah.
Okay. End of September of '21. Callan?
No, that's Dawson.
Dawson. Okay. September '21. Callan was born when? I'm sorry.
May 2022.
Okay. And Christmas Eve, December 24th of 2021.
That's Cora's birthday.
Okay. And that's her birthday party that year?
Yeah.
Now that's 2021, right?
Correct.
Fast forward one year, and that would be December, Christmas of 2022, right?
Right.
And was that when you guys had the birthday party for Cora at the trampolines?
No.
When was that?
I believe it was January 7th.
Okay. But that would've been for that particular birthday, right?
That was for the birthday with friends because most people weren't available on Christmas Eve.
Christmas Eve, right.
Yep.
Okay. And then down. Again, September 1st of '22. Remember when that was taken?
Yeah, that's with Callan and Dawson.
And was that your yard?
That's in the backyard.
Backyard. Okay. This would have been September of '22, obviously right before '23, right?
Right.
And again, for this one here, July of '22, can you tell the jurors, you guys had a pretty good summer that year?
It was a good summer. Yeah. That was on Cape Cod.
This picture was on Cape Cod?
Yeah.
A couple of points that I wanted to raise, sir, with you. We have an email sent from your, is it Surface Pro? Is that what it's called?
That was my laptop. Yeah.
I'm going to approach you, sir, and ask if you can identify this as being an email that you sent.
Yeah.
Okay. Could I offer that, Your Honor?
Any objection?
I'd just like to know the purpose of-
Purpose?
Yes.
I'll tell you the purpose.
No, you-
Sidebar.
Sure. Yeah.
No objection, Your Honor.
Okay, thank you. That may be admitted.
I don't know if it's on there or not.
Well, while we're waiting for the copy, let me just move on to something else. Do you recall yesterday the district attorney was asking you a question or stated to you that on December 2nd of 2022, that you and your wife went to a fancy hotel in Boston and she had a massage and you both had a big dinner. Do you recall her asking you that question?
Yeah.
And in fact, would you agree, sir, that you did not, in fact, go to a fancy hotel on December 2nd of '22, being a Saturday night before your anniversary on the 3rd? You stayed at home, didn't you?
We did. We stayed at home.
And when you were asked that question by the DA, she wanted the inference to be that Lindsay Clancy in December of '22 was so relaxed that she wanted to have a massage and have a big dinner in a hotel. In fact, she was in her bed in her bedroom that night, wasn't she?
Objection.
Sustained. If you could rephrase that.
I'm approaching you with what appears to be from one of the photographs that the district attorney had showed you yesterday with her in a mask, and I believe the document of the mask, right?
Yep.
Now that photograph, sir, was actually preserved, if you will, on the Laptop Pro computer. Isn't that right? Did she send that to you?
She sent it to my computer.
Okay.
But I don't know.
And where was she? Do you remember when that picture was taken? Let me just show you. That's what the photograph was.
It looks like they're at the doctor.
At the doctor's office. Okay. And can you tell me the date that that picture, right-hand corner top, what date was that picture taken and sent to your computer?
December 2nd.
The same date that we're talking about, correct?
Correct.
And what time was the picture sent?
12:45 PM.
Okay. So the jury can [inaudible 05:48:23]. So when you're dealing with these things on the computers, it's a little hard sometimes to understand what they're depicting, and I'm having a hard time moving it. Here it is. All right. Right there, you see that there? That's the date that we're talking about, right?
Right. Just to clarify though, it looks like that was on an iPhone.
Oh, I'm sorry. iPhone. Okay. It was sent to you though.
Correct.
And it was on December 2nd, the date that the DA was suggesting you were in Boston having massages and dinner, right?
Objection. That was December 3rd.
All right. Sustained.
It's the jury's memory that...
Yeah. If you can answer that.
Do you recall, sir, that she also had sent you the same day or taken a picture of what appears to be Cora's Christmas list, wishlist? Is that what that is?
Yeah.
Okay. And if you look at the record on that, that was sent... If you can read that.
It's December 2nd at 6:13 PM.
6:13 PM. And then finally, if you look at the metadata that is apparently buried in the photograph, it gives latitude and longitude of where the photograph was taken. Is that right? Are you familiar with metadata? I would imagine. Now why I can't do this?
Because you can use the tape. Use the tape. The tape on the thing tells you where to put the...
Oh. Thank you.
Yeah, that's our address.
Okay. And that would be the metadata with the latitude and the longitude and shows you where these photos were taken, correct?
Correct.
Okay. How about for these, Your Honor?
So I think we had Exhibit 76. They're making a copy of that. Do you want to mark that? I don't know if we marked that yet. That was the earlier one, just so everybody could keep this straight. And this latest email would be Exhibit 77?
[inaudible 05:51:02] 76.
That would be the letter, the email?
The one that was just copied.
Yeah, the email right here. Yep.
Two pages?
Yes.
Exhibit 76 and 77.
Okay.
Thank you. Now, sir, Exhibit 76 is an email from you to... And we will try to delete the people that are on the email, if I may, Your Honor, as we mark it as an exhibit. Let me approach you. Does it indicate the date and the time on the very top, you sent that email to your staff members or the people that work with you?
It does. Yep.
Tell the jurors what the date was.
It's January 24th at 5:24.
And that was sent from your Surface Pro?
I don't know actually. It could have been sent from my iPhone.
Okay. [inaudible 05:52:18]. It's all we got.
That would be Exhibit 76.
Now, when was Callan born?
May 26th, 2022.
My memory serves that it was a good birth. Not easy birth, but I mean, there were no complications?
There were no complications.
And were both of you very happy with Callan being born healthy and...
Yeah, we felt very lucky.
And then in that summer of '22, you had one of the best summers that you've had, right?
Yeah.
What happened in September, October of 2022?
Lindsay's mental health started to deteriorate.
And when you say that, sir, what is it that you as her husband observed?
Just increased stress and anxiety.
And did she, as a result of that, go to see or reach out for help to see someone?
Yes.
And who was that?
I believe it was Jennifer Tufts.
Now, Jennifer Tufts is a psychiatrist?
Yeah.
And where is she located?
I never went to her office. Somewhere on the South Shore.
Do you remember when Lindsay went to see Jennifer Tufts?
I don't remember the exact date. I think it was sometime in September. I wasn't really involved at the beginning of Jennifer Tufts.
Of course. Do you recall that the difficulties or the troubles, so to speak, began towards the end of September into October of '22?
Yeah, it was pretty gradual.
Okay. But do you remember when the DA asked you yesterday whether or not you used your computer to Google suicide in, I think, it was August of '22. Do you remember her asking you that question?
Yes.
And do you remember your response?
No, honestly.
You didn't Google that, did you?
I don't think I did, no.
No. But I'm going to show you, sir, a web history of your computer. Have in mind that the question was asked of you as to whether or not in August of '22 you Googled suicide and you responded no, right?
Correct.
The inference being, I guess, that back in August of '22, she would've Googled it apparently, right?
Sure.
Do you know a guy named Tim Hall?
I think you mean Tom Hall?
Yeah, Tom Hall. I apologize. Who's Tom Hall?
He's a musical artist.
He's a what artist?
Like a musical, like a country artist.
Country. Is he like a guitar playing guy or singer?
Yeah, was.
When you say was, what happened to him?
He committed suicide.
And I'm going to show you, sir, your Surface Pro records back in August of '22. Do you recall Googling the name Tom Hall so you could access one of his new albums or new records?
I do remember briefly listening to Tom Hall's music.
Okay. Now you haven't seen this document before, correct?
Correct.
All right. And this would be... I'm sure you're probably familiar with it. When you get a phone dump or a computer records dump, you get a printout of all the sites that somebody would go on, Google, Wikipedia, things like that.
Right.
If you can look to the right.
Yep.
Down a little bit, and you see, I think it says Tom Hall.
Yeah.
What does it say on Tom Hall?
It says his Wikipedia page.
Yep. Let me see here. So here we've got... So that shows you when somebody Googled and then it goes Wikipedia. And you see where up above it says suicide methods?
Yeah.
Now you didn't, as you said to the DA, you didn't Google suicide methods, right?
I didn't Google suicide methods, no.
But in fact, sir, when you Googled Tom Hall, it took you to the Wikipedia page and it said that he died, right?
He did, yeah.
And then you clicked on the Wikipedia page and then it went into a hyperlink. You know what a hyperlink is? I imagine you do know hyperlink.
Yeah.
What is a hyperlink, just so I know?
So like in Wikipedia, it would be a word that's highlighted in blue and it goes to a website.
Okay. So if I suggest to you, sir, that as you moved down on your searches that afternoon that you were looking at Tom Hall, that it brought you to ways to commit suicide, suicide, Tom Hall, Google search again, Tom Hall, all on that date at the same time. And you were just looking to see about the guy because he killed himself, right?
Yeah, I think so. Yeah.
I'd offer this, Your Honor.
Any objection?
Can I just see the packet?
Oh yeah.
Again, Your Honor, I got that in discovery from the DA, so it's...
Well, it's an email from his expert, not us.
Just take a look at it and we'll kind of go from there. Hold on a second.
While she's looking at that, I'll just ask, what is a URL? What does that mean?
Hold on a second. She gets a chance to finish.
Yes, I would object.
All right. If I could see counsel.
So while that's being marked Exhibit E for ID, basically that would at least refresh your memory, sir, that in fact, inadvertently, that you touched the Wikipedia thing for suicide, but it was for Tom Hall, the singer, right?
Sounds like that was the case.
Okay. Do you recall what medication Lindsay was put on by Dr. Tufts?
She started with Zoloft.
Now, counsel had asked you about whether or not Lindsay was on Zoloft or any SSRI antidepressant medication in the past. Do you remember that question?
Yeah.
Do you remember her asking that you were having a conversation with her and she said that she was going on Zoloft and that she had already been to Tufts or... Was it Tufts that she got the script from?
Correct.
Okay. She told you that, right?
Yeah.
She didn't hide that from you, right?
No.
And you were at a wedding, is that right? You were walking down the street, the two of you together at the end of the night and she basically told you that she had to use the meds.
It was earlier in the day. It was before the wedding, but yeah.
Okay. And do you recall... How, to your observation, how dedicated was she to taking her medications as instructed by the numerous doctors that she ultimately saw?
She always took them as instructed.
Do you remember, did she in fact have a diary that she kept of the milligrams, the type of medication, the date that she took the medication and what, if any, reactions that she had to it? Do you recall that?
Yeah.
And do you remember where that was kept? Did she keep it in any particular place?
I think she kept it in the kitchen.
In the kitchen. So I'm going to show you a photograph that the state police took in your house. Is this a fair and accurate depiction of your kitchen?
Yes.
So that kind of shows a bunch of books that are in a cabinet or something, right?
Right.
I'm going to show you this enlarged spine, if you will, of a book. I'm going to ask if you ever saw that before.
I don't recall seeing this.
Would you agree, sir, that this book is in fact the same book, the same coloring that was in the bunch of books in your kitchen?
Yeah.
Okay. And on this book, you see what the caption of the book is.
Yeah. It says, "Good moms have scary thoughts."
And I'm going to approach you with this document, sir, which would be a number of pages from the book, the cover of the book, and the inside of the book. You've never seen that before though?
I don't recall seeing this.
Okay. So with that understanding, Your Honor, I will not offer this at this time.
Hold on. Counsel, come up. Mr. Reddington, if you could show what it is that you got.
I'm sorry, you said you're not offering it?
Well, we don't have the foundation.
Okay.
All right. Any objection?
No.
Okay. So can I put it in?
Yes, that's fine.
Okay. Great. Thank you.
No objection to him not offering it. If I could just look at it, there may...
Why don't we do this? Why doesn't everybody come over here with that and we can kind of figure out where we go?
I would offer the book. Well, a copy of the book.
No objection.
Okay. That may be admitted.
Who was the next doctor, if you recall, that Lindsay went to consult with?
Julie Paul.
And is this a doctor or a nurse practitioner?
I don't remember with Julie Paul. It was very brief.
Okay. Now, is it fair to say that Julie Paul was at South Shore in Labor and Delivery?
Yeah. Correct.
And Julie Paul was a friend of your mother's, is that right?
Yeah. I think they were acquaintances. Yeah.
And your mother was a nurse also at South Shore Hospital?
In L&D, yeah.
L&D, Labor and Delivery. Same thing. Okay. And your mother was good enough to refer Lindsay to this person to consult with, right?
Yeah. I don't think it was a formal referral. I think she just said this is a specialist that you might want to talk with.
All right. And did she go to see this specialist?
Yeah.
And did you go with her or was this a-
No, I never met Julie Paul.
I should back myself up. Were these in-person meetings or are they, like, what do you call them? Zoom meetings?
Most of the meetings were Zoom. The only in-person that I'm aware of was with Rebecca Jollotta.
Rebecca Jollotta. Okay. And that was because you insisted on it, right?
I thought it was warranted at that time. Yeah.
Right, because you were pretty much at your wit's end with the 15 minute Zooms and you wanted to sit down eyeball to eyeball and talk to this person, right?
I hadn't attended any prior to that. I just wanted to get clarification. I wanted to see if we could get on the same page.
All right. So now Lindsay's on Zoloft from Dr. Tufts, the psychiatrist, correct?
Correct.
And then that runs into when when she goes to see Nurse Paul?
Can you clarify?
What was it?
Can you clarify what you're asking?
Yeah. What month? When was it that she saw Nurse Paul?
Maybe October, but I'm not sure.
Okay. When she saw Nurse Paul, do you remember where she saw Nurse Paul or was it a video thing?
I don't know. I wasn't involved.
Okay. Did Nurse Paul prescribe medication to her?
Objection.
I'll allow it if he knows.
I don't know off the top of my head.
All right. Do you recall whether or not, to your opinion, that she had any reactions to the Zoloft that she had been placed on by Dr. Tufts?
Objection.
I don't know any observations that were made.
Right. So it's not guesswork, it's observations. Is there anything you saw and observed?
Yeah, it seemed to align with her insomnia symptoms.
Now, the insomnia, or inability to sleep, was that a significant problem from your observations with her?
Yeah, it was a huge problem.
And when you say huge problem, was there one point when she was on medication from Tufts that in fact she had gone 48 hours, I think, without sleep?
Yeah.
And that was disturbing to her?
Yeah, and it was just hard to function.
And how about you? Was it disturbing to you?
I just wanted her to get sleep and feel better.
Now, during that period of time, she then went and saw the next doctor, a nurse practitioner, which we talked about, which would be Nurse Practitioner Paul at South Shore, right?
Right.
Now, after seeing Nurse Practitioner Paul, if you remember or know, did you observe, did she seem to get better or did she seem to get worse?
It would be hard to say. I think it was a week at most, so it's really hard to say in that short of timeframe.
Sure. And when you say a week at most, you mean that she was seeing Nurse Practitioner Paul for about a week?
Yeah. And I mean, she may have only seen her once. It was very brief. And then she got reassigned somewhere.
And the reason, if you know, that she got reassigned somewhere would be Nurse Practitioner Jollotta, right?
Right.
Same practice, right?
Right.
And the reason was because Paul moved on to another job, right?
Right.
So Lindsay wasn't out doctor hunting. She was referred by the nurse practitioner that was referred to you guys by your mom because Paul was leaving, right?
Yeah. She just switched doctors in the same practice.
All right. Now she sees Dr. Jollotta, right?
Right.
Did Dr. Jollotta, to your knowledge, put her on medication?
Yeah.
And what was the medication, if you know?
Mainly Seroquel and benzodiazepines, Ativan.
Now, benzodiazepines, they're addictive, right?
Apparently.
Objection.
I'll allow it.
And a benzo would be, for example, Ativan, correct?
Correct.
Now, Seroquel, she was placed on Seroquel as well. Is that correct?
Right.
And to your observation, again, you're not a doctor, what you saw of your wife, was she affected positively or negatively by the Seroquel that she was on?
It appeared that she was affected very negatively, and she's reporting that she was getting worse on the Seroquel.
And do you know, did she report that to Dr. Jollotta?
Yeah.
When she would consult with Dr. Jollotta prior to you actually going, do you know, were they all on video? If you know.
Yeah, they were all on Zoom.
Okay. Do you have any opinion for the jury as to approximately how long these meetings on Zoom would be with the nurse practitioner?
Probably around 20 minutes.
At some point, do you recall that you went with Lindsay to see Dr. Jollotta? Is that right?
Yes.
And do you remember, if you remember, when that was?
Early December.
In early December of 2022, can you tell the jury, from your observations, how did Lindsay appear? How was she acting? How was she faring?
She was extremely sleep-deprived and just highly anxious.
Was there a number of occasions that you would actually see her on the sofa rocking back and forth with her head under a pillow?
Yeah.
Did you report that and other symptoms to Dr. Jollotta?
Lindsay did.
So when was it, if you recall, that you went and saw Dr. Jollotta with your wife person to person?
When was it?
Yep.
Early December. I think it was December 6th.
You have pretty good memory about this. Do you remember what medication she was prescribed by Jollotta?
Coming out of that meeting?
Yep.
Yeah, she increased the Seroquel significantly, and then she prescribed her Valium to help taper off of the benzos.
Taper off the benzos?
Valium to help taper off of the benzos.
Taper off the benzos?
Yeah.
To your knowledge, did Lindsay go to doctors to seek out benzodiazepines or drugs just because she was a drug addict?
No. No. Lindsay, I think wanted to... She definitely didn't want to take any more benzodiazepines and definitely didn't want to take any more Seroquel. I think that it wasn't really a matter of trying to get off the medication. It was just trying to get on the right medication.
Okay. Let's say mid-December, what observations, if any, heading up towards Christmas did you guys endure?
She seemed to get worse. The Seroquel was increased to 400 milligrams.
400?
Yep.
By Dr. Jolata.
Yeah. And the idea behind that was it would help with sleep, but she didn't get better. She got worse.
Do you recall that at one point she went to a place called Women's and Infants?
Yeah.
In Rhode Island.
Right.
Women and Infants Center for Women's Behavioral Health. Do you recall that?
Right.
Do you remember when she actually went to Women's Behavioral Health?
Sometime in mid-December. I don't know the exact date.
All right. So if I suggest to you, sir, that I have certified copies of the Women and Infants medical records indicating that on December 20th of 2022, that was the day that you dropped her off at Women. Does that refresh your memory?
Yeah.
Your Honor, I'd like to offer the certified copies of the Women and Infants Hospital records.
I would object. We don't have a copy of those.
All right.
You don't have them?
Could I see. Everybody here?
Exhibit that for identification.
So Mr. Clancy, do you remember that day, December 20th of 2022, that she went to that place? How did she get there?
I drove her.
And do you remember dropping her off?
Yeah.
Do you remember what her state of mind was to go there? Was she scared? Was she happy? Was she?
I think she was scared.
Do you remember what you did that day?
I took Dawson skiing.
And where did you go skiing?
Wisconsin.
At some point in the afternoon, did you receive a phone call?
Yeah.
Was it from Lindsay?
Yeah.
And as a result of the phone call, what did you do?
She said that you need to come pick me up and the doctors here want to talk to you, have you come in and talk for a bit.
Okay. Did you go and talk to them?
Yeah.
Do you remember who you talked to?
I don't remember their names.
Do you remember the conversation? Did you describe or indicate what her symptoms were at that point in December 20th of 2022?
Yeah, the conversation was they didn't -
Objection?
Yes.
All right. Sustained at this time.
Did the people at Women's and Infants facility in Rhode Island prescribe any medication to your knowledge?
I don't think so.
They provide any counseling or anything?
I think they tried to, but they felt that it wasn't the right fit for Lindsay.
Okay. Do you recall that in fact it was because of the drugs, they weren't sure what symptomology would be because of the drugs?
Objection.
Sustained.
Do you recall whether or not the people at Women and Infants in Rhode Island reached out to Dr. Jolata?
Objection.
I don't think so.
If he knows.
I don't think they did, no.
And was it one day or half a day that she went to Women and Infants in Rhode Island?
It was a half a day.
Half a day. So after you pick her up and you bring her home, it's now you and the kids and Lindsay, and it's days before Christmas, right?
Yeah, and her parents were there.
Why were her parents there?
They were visiting, trying to help out, and I took Dawson and watch she said they stayed home with Cora and Karen.
Now, during that timeframe in December of 22, maybe a little bit before, maybe after Thanksgiving, did your mom and dad and Lindsay's parents come to your house and try to help out with the kids?
Yeah, I think it was separately though.
Yeah, of course it would be separate. I mean, what would they do?
Just be there, help out, play with them to get takeout, play Scrabble.
Did Lindsay's mother and father actually stay there and sleep in the basement for -
They did, yeah.
... time? Were you aware personally. Let me back up. You and Lindsay as husband and wife would in effect sleep in the same bedroom. Is that correct?
Yeah.
There was an occasion though that she said to you about you go downstairs and then I think she ended up downstairs?
Yeah, for the purposes of her getting better sleep.
And for her purposes of getting better sleep, were you aware that on one occasion she used a gummy, a sleep aid gummy? Did you know that?
I don't recall that, but we did have them in the house.
Okay. Now, to your knowledge, was Lindsay a person that liked to smoke the weed and use the CBDs oils and all that stuff? Or did she not imbibe in that?
No, she didn't smoke.
So you had these gummies in the house, sleep aid, right?
I mean, some people might call them a sleep aid.
Okay. Heading into the holidays of 22, do you recall where you spent Christmas?
I think it was at our house. We celebrated Cora's birthday, and then I think we actually went down to Wallingford, Connecticut to be with her parents after.
Her parents?
Yeah.
Okay. And then heading into January of '23, who did she then see for doctors or nurse practitioners, if you know?
After she got back from McLean?
Yes.
She switched back to Jennifer Tuffs.
Now, before she switches back to Tuffs in January, on New Year's of 2022, 2023, you guys drive to Boston, go to MGH, and ultimately she turns herself into McLean Hospital, right?
Right.
Now, McLean Hospital is basically a locked ward facility, correct?
Correct.
Was she allowed to just wander around and leave the place whenever she wanted?
She couldn't leave, but inside she could go to different areas.
Can you tell the jury what her state of mind was as she went to McLean Hospital with her husband on New Year's '23 at that point?
She was scared. She didn't want to go. But I think it was the second time we went to the ER and I said, "You have to go."
Now at McLean Hospital, I know you visited with her. Is that correct?
Yeah.
District attorney asked you yesterday about the excellent care that she was provided with all these counselors and therapists, and you indicated that it was your understanding that she was playing with clay and coloring, right?
Right.
Can you describe for the jury what McLean was like to you as a husband visiting his wife? In other words, were there doctors? Were there nurses? Were there people in the hallways?
What I saw was, it looked like mainly nurses. It was the tail end of COVID, so they're mostly behind this plastic covered area. And it could have been just the time of day that I visited, but people were hanging around watching TV, playing with clay.
Do you know whether or not she saw a doctor, a psychiatrist ultimately from McLean Hospital?
I was not aware of that. The only one I was aware of, it was the doctor on the second to last or final day.
And was that Dr. Goodheart?
Yeah.
And did you speak to Dr. Goodheart?
I ended up calling her.
Call her?
I wanted to see what her evaluation was. And so I gave her a call and we spoke and she said she's clearly depressed.
Sustained.
Okay. So you spoke to Dr. Goodheart.
Yeah.
Did Dr. Goodheart, to your knowledge, prescribe any medication?
I think she recommended medication. And then -
How many medications did she recommend?
I don't know if she recommended multiple. I want to say it was Cymbalta, but she said, check with your doctor and make a decision.
So when Lindsay left, it was because she wanted to leave one day early because of Cora's birthday. Is that right?
I don't think it was one day early. I think she had a five-day stay, which at the time was my understanding was that was pretty standard. And yeah, she did want to attend Cora's birthday.
So there's no doubt, sir, in your mind that when she was discharged from McLean that... You got these, right? McLean?
Yes. Yeah.
That when she was discharged from McLean Hospital, it was not against medical advice. The doctors gave her bill of health and let her go with you, right?
Right.
And after the McLean records, Your Honor.
Any objection?
No.
All right. They may be admitted.
Now, you know when you go to the hospital and you get out of the hospital, they give you a bag and you've got medications and a little card and says, thank you for being here, stuff like that. Did you guys get anything from McLean at all?
I don't think so.
Did you get any recommendations other than the doctor suggesting that you might want to try Cymbalta? Did they give you a script?
I don't think so.
You know what Cymbalta was?
No.
Do you remember Dr. Goodheart telling Lindsay to Google it?
I think that's accurate.
Yeah. In fact, she Googled hundreds of times medication, right?
Yeah.
So when you guys go home, and now it's January obviously, you had the party for Cora, correct?
Yeah.
You guys had friends over or friends that you guys knew?
Friends came to the party, which was at a place in Plymouth.
Would you agree with me that Lindsay had a number of friends from actually grammar school through high school, through college that she stayed in touch with over the years?
Yeah.
And you as well?
Yep.
And they're good friends. You still would see them and you guys would do dinner and things of that nature, right?
Yeah.
Actually, one of your friends, I think it was one of your friends, it might've been one of her friends, actually named her in January or around that timeframe to be godmother or take care of their child if anything bad happened to them and they were dead, right? You remember that?
My brain has been foggy for the last couple years.
I understand.
Yeah.
Okay. In January, as time went by, do you recall that she would actually continue to take notes of her medications that she was taking, right?
That sounds like something Lindsay would do.
Kept a diary or a little log, right?
Yep.
I'm approaching you, sir, with this and asking if you can identify this handwriting.
Yes.
And when you say yes, and I'll put it on the little screen, what is it?
It's the dosage of medication that she took and how she's feeling.
So this is kind of like a little medical diary that she was keeping?
Yeah.
For example, here you see on that five milligrams Valium, 200 Seroquel, slept well, horrible thoughts in the morning, right?
Yeah.
And did she at some point, I think the DA had asked you. I'm going to offer this, Your Honor, if I may.
Any objection?
No.
That may be admitted.
Sixteen.
Thank you.
There was an occasion where she told you in the presence of her mother that she was having horrible thoughts, right?
Right.
And you told us about that yesterday. It was quite an emotional thing for her to do that, right?
Right.
After that timeframe, you continued on. You were working in the basement, right?
Yeah.
I shouldn't say basement. It was a finished place, right?
Finished basement. Yeah.
And that was where you worked on a regular basis. Is that right?
Yeah.
Would that be a 40-hour week or longer?
It varied, but yeah, roughly 40 hours.
And I know it was maybe COVID, tail end of COVID, but one of the other reasons that you did that was so you could be home and help out. Is that right?
Yeah. I worked from home since 2018.
Okay.
But yeah, I built an office down there.
So you were always there?
Yeah.
Not always, but you were down there when you would work.
When I wasn't traveling, yeah, I was there.
Okay. So when would you travel? Tell us about that.
I really didn't travel actually much during COVID. Just towards the end and once in November.
November of what year?
2022
November of 2022.
But before that I traveled extensively.
Let's look at November of 2022. November of 2022 is a month before she's telling you and her mother that she was having thoughts about hurting the children, right?
Right.
November of 2022 and you traveled. Where did you travel to?
New York.
And how long were you there, sir?
Two nights.
And who took care of the kids?
Lindsay.
Sorry?
Lindsay took care of the kids.
Lindsay. So for two days, two nights, a month and a week or so before she killed the children, she was home with the kids for two days. Is that right?
Right.
Fair to say that you also had your friends that you would do brunch with on occasion, Sundays or weeknights or whenever, guys' night type thing?
Yep.
And you'd be out with your friends if she wanted to kill the kids. She certainly could have done it that time when you're out, right?
In theory.
As opposed to sending you on a three-minute trip to CVS and a nine-minute trip to a restaurant, you were away for two days in November and on a number of occasions for brunch as well as skiing, right? You're a pretty active guy.
Yeah.
Right? I'm going to approach you, sir, and another one of the books that was in the kitchen cabinet, I believe. Do you remember if you ever saw this one?
I don't think so.
But is it fair to say, sir, that she had a number of books about parenting and things like that? And this one here was pregnancy and postpartum anxiety workbook. Did she have workbooks that you were aware of or work diagrams and things like that?
She had books of different sorts.
So you can't identify this as being in the kitchen, right?
I don't recall seeing that book, no.
Then may I present this.
Sure.
Thank you.
Sixty seven.
[inaudible 06:32:37].
Thank you. By the way... I'll withdraw that. I'm going to approach you, sir, with this document. Excuse me. And ask if you can identify it.
It says postpartum depression and anxiety patient information sheet.
And if you go towards the end there, does it appear to be her writing in it?
Yeah.
Okay. Thank you. May I offer this, Your Honor.
No objection.
All right. That may be admitted.
Exhibit 81.
Yeah. Understatement. Now, sir, I'm looking at this item. It's got a bunch of flowers on the front. It appears to be a notebook. Is it your understanding that the state police went in your house and they seized all sorts of items such as this?
Yep.
So we don't have originals that the police do, but these are copies. Fair and accurate?
Yeah.
Is that the caption that you were referring to?
Yes.
Postpartum depression and anxiety.
Yes.
And at the end of this particular document, you would agree, sir, that it has writing? Oops.
Yeah.
And whose writing is that?
Lindsay's.
And is this like a book or notes that she would take documenting on a daily basis any effect that she had from postpartum?
It appears to be the case.
Yeah. Your Honor, I would offer the records of Dr. Jennifer Tuffs as the mental health records.
No objection.
All right. They may be admitted.
I'm going to have to, I think, maybe talk to the DA about this because I do have a lot of tabs and notes in this one. I know we have clean copies, right?
We have a clean copy we were planning to admit, so that's not a problem.
Okay. We'll enter that and then before we can then substitute it with a clean copy.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Exhibit for identification.
John, can I see the exhibit for the... One of the things that you had identified yesterday was the document that you obtained from CVS. Is that correct?
Yes.
It sets forth all of the medications that were purchased by Lindsay by prescription from the physicians that she had seen during that period of time, correct?
Correct.
And you indicated yesterday that the police had seized a number of pill bottles, and then you also had a number of pill bottles. Is that right?
Right.
And the pill bottles that you had, do you recall what were the circumstances that you had them in a bag in your car?
The reason I had them in a bag is because sometimes a provider would adjust medications. So for example, I do remember Lindsay had a prescription of Ativan and then a few days later they wanted to increase the dosage because it wasn't effective. So what they would do is they would say, give that old prescription to your husband. He'll discard it and then continue taking from the new prescription.
When the DA yesterday went through that there were scripts and there were pills with a 30 count, but then there's 27 and three were gone, but that's because she wasn't taking her medication. That's not the case. It was what you were told to do, right?
Correct. Yeah. Without that context, it paints a different picture.
Exhibit two would be the pills that you had turned in, I believe. Is that correct? They were in your bag in your car?
Right.
I know you can't tell from looking at the bag.
I remembered it's exhibit two though.
Okay. Wednesday, January 24th, one of the troopers located four medication bottles. And at some point on the 26th at about 2:30 in the afternoon, bottles were then documented by the police. When was it, if you know, that you turned these items into the police?
I believe it was after the event. I don't remember the exact date, but I remember I told them I do have other prescriptions in my truck still, and I gave them to them.
Okay. So the police already went in with a search warrant. They already seized all the drugs that they could find in the house, in the kitchen, in the bedroom. Were there drugs in the kitchen, by the way?
Yeah. Yeah.
They're all over the place, right?
Yeah.
And they seized it, right?
Yeah.
And then you, to be cooperative, told the police that you also had pills in your car and you went to the DA's office and gave them to Attorney Sprag and the state police, right?
Right. But to be clear, those were discontinued prescriptions.
These are the ones that she stopped.
Correct.
All right. And then you had new prescriptions, and they were new prescriptions that were prescribed to her, right?
Yes.
Now, when I met with you in the house, long after the state police had gone and finished their search, you recall that we went up to the bedroom and I removed this from the nightstand right next to the bed.
Yeah.
Can you tell us what that is? What is this? Is it a drawer obviously?
That's the drawer that goes into the nightstand.
And inside the drawer, sir, do you recall that there were a number of items that I see? Trazodone, Lindsay Clancy, prescribed on January five, 2023. Quetiapine, January. Quetiapine, 100 milligrams, prescribed for Lindsay Clancy December 21st. Lorazepam. They're all empty too, right?
Yeah.
Because these are what she shot down with that lemonade or water or whatever was in the cup that she ground up these pills, right? Lamotrigine, described to Lindsay Clancy December 16th of '22. Mirtazapine prescribed to Lindsay Clancy, January 23. Those are in this drawer and they were all empty, right?
Right.
You observed that, right?
Yeah.
There's something else that was in the drawer. Do you recognize that?
Yeah.
What is it?
It's her Apple Watch.
Her Apple Watch. This is the Apple Watch that apparently the police used to go up the stairs, downstairs type, things of that nature, right?
Yep.
They never even seized it, did they? They left it in the drawer, right?
Apparently.
What is this item, sir? If you can identify that for us.
It's a face mask for sleeping.
To sleep?
Yeah.
Now you had mentioned something, I think, about pillow spray. What is that?
She bought some pillow spray. It apparently helps you sleep.
And did you see her using that on a regular basis?
Yeah.
Yes?
Yeah, she did.
Okay. Your Honor, I would offer the drawer.
Is there objection?
If I could just see.
Yeah.
I think you left the watch.
Watch.
There's a watch on the side there.
Oh, it was in the closet.
No objection.
Okay. Good. Do you want to put that in as one exhibit?
Sure.
Okay.
Now in reference to the Apple Watch, sir, how many Apple Watches did she have, if you know?
Just one.
Just one. It's the only one she had. The police never seized it, right?
Correct.
And the drugs that were in the drug, the empty drugs and the pill bottles from January and December '22, '23, the police never seized them, did they?
No.
I'm showing you an item, sir. It's like a little green vase. Have you ever seen that before?
Yeah.
Can you tell the jury what it is?
Objection. We could go to sidebar.
Yeah. Can I see counsel sidebar, please?
To your knowledge, sir, was she advised by Nurse Practitioner Huffs to keep a nighttime dump diary of all of her thoughts and write them down so that she had something that she could refer to?
Not that I'm aware of.
Do you ever see her writing notes in a diary or a thing with dates on it, November 23rd, for example, things of that nature?
I knew she kept notes, but I didn't see her doing it.
I'm going to show you this document. That appears to be her handwriting.
Yeah.
And does that contain indication as to her state of mind, particular date or dates thereafter?
Yeah.
Just take a look at the other pages to make sure that you have her handwriting.
Yep.
Your Honor, I would offer this.
Come.
Can I see it, please?
Yeah.
And I got it from the state police, so let's assume you guys have it.
No objection.
Okay. That may be admitted.
I'm going to show you another document. So it appears to be a document. Do you recognize her handwriting in that document with dates, September 29th, for example, '22?
Yes.
And can you tell us what that appears to be, sir, if you know?
It looks like a schedule for Callan.
A schedule for Callan, that would be what, like when he's eating or sleeping or something like that?
Yeah, and naps. Yeah.
So for example, where it says September 29th, there it is, '22, and then it makes reference to Callan, last fed with a timeframe, and then there's a bunch of pages like that that go forward on those dates. Is that what that is?
Yeah.
Put him down for a nap, 9:35 with a smiley face, things like that, right?
Right.
Is this typical for Lindsay that she would document these things as a new mother?
Yeah.
Was she being controlling in your opinion of her child and of you by doing this schedule?
No, I found it helpful.
Now for this, Your Honor. I don't think there's anything.
Any objection?
No objection.
That may be admitted.
[inaudible 06:49:16].
One of the things, sir, that the district attorney had asked you about is the exhibits of the, I think it was the window in the bedroom. You said it was 20 feet drop to the ground?
Right.
Is that right? This is a photograph of the same one you already introduced, but I just don't know where it is. So this is the photograph of the house, and you can identify that, right?
Yeah, that's the living room window.
Okay. And the window that you're talking about that's 20 feet up would be on the very top of that picture, correct?
Correct.
Now, when you identified this picture, and I can't see. You see that there's some kind of an orange ball, appears to be an orange ball, underneath the silk?
Yeah.
To the left. It appears to be red marks or red spots, like possibly blood above it.
Yep.
Can you tell the jurors what that little orange ball is?
Yeah. We had a woodpecker who would peck at the house and create holes. That's why I paired some of the other sections too. And I took some foam and filled the hole.
I'd offer that, Your Honor, just a continuity.
No objection.
That may be admitted.
And I'd also, if I may, just the top picture, I believe is also. See where it looks like fingerprints or blood on the edge of the window on the second floor, you see that? That's from the house?
Yeah.
Excuse me. I'm turning right into it.
Yeah. Okay. Okay. I'm talking about the hornet thing right here. And then this is... I see on this top here. Okay. So you see on the top of this window here. It's not a very good picture. Underneath the hornet thing, I see it, but in the exhibit you can see there's blood drops or blood smears there.
Yep. I see it.
That's the first floor window that's directly underneath the second floor window, right?
Right.
Okay. And now for this, Your Honor.
Any objection?
No.
They may be admitted.
I'm all set. Thank you, sir.
All right. Commonwealth, redirect?
Yes, Your Honor. Thank you. Mr. Clancy, you were shown an email and it's been marked as an exhibit that you sent to coworkers on January 24th, 2023 at 5:24 PM, correct?
Yeah.
And you were asked about it coming from the Surface Pro, but your testimony was that it could have come from your iPhone, correct?
Correct.
And in fact, you watched footage earlier of yourself going into the CVS in Kingston at 5:32 PM, correct?
Correct.
And you had your phone with you, correct? Because you used it?
Yeah.
And we also saw you on the 3V footage using your phone as well, correct?
Right.
So you were clearly out of the house at 5:24 PM, correct?
Sorry, what time did you say I was at CVS?
So you walked in at 5:32 PM, correct?
Correct.
And you left the house. As you were leaving the house, Lindsay sent you the text about Pedia-Lax, correct?
I don't know if I had left the house yet, but yeah.
But that was sent at 5:15 PM, correct?
Right.
And how far away is the Kingston CVS?
Three minutes.
Okay. And so you leave the house, you get into your car, and you drive to CVS, correct?
Correct.
And so that should have taken three minutes, correct?
Yep.
So after the text that was sent at 5:15 PM, that would've been sometime around 5:18 or 5:20 PM that you should have arrived at CVS, correct?
Right.
But you don't go in until 5:32 PM, correct?
I don't know.
We could pull-
I don't know what time I pulled in the parking lot.
I'm not asking what time you pulled into the parking lot, but is it fair to say that the video that you were shown earlier shows you entering the store at 5:32 PM?
Yes.
So from the time you should have been at the parking lot of CVS around 5:20 PM until 5:32 PM, could you have been in your car sending this email on your iPhone?
Yeah. I just don't know if I pulled into the parking lot at 5:20.
But sometime after the text was sent from Lindsay about Pedia-Lax, but before 5:32 PM, you were in your car?
Correct. Yes.
Now, you were asked about my questions to you about going to Boston, and my questions to you were about December 3rd, not December 2nd, correct?
Correct.
Because your anniversary is December 3rd, not December 2nd, correct?
Right.
So Dawson was taken to the doctor's on December 2nd, correct?
Correct.
And on December 3rd, did you have plans? Not that they were followed through, but did you have plans to go to Boston that day?
Yeah, so I can provide some clarification on that.
Sure.
So yeah, on Monday I was a little bit confused by it because we were home. But yeah, I think there was a plan prior to that, like an anniversary plan to go to Boston, but it was canceled.
Okay, great.
And the picture you showed was from September.
So the plans that you had to go to Boston, I'm showing you here some text messages between yourself and Lindsay. And here, there's one here that says, "The spa at the Omni is booked, but you're on the waitlist. As a backup, I have you booked for massage at the nearby IHG for 90 minutes at 1:45." Is that correct?
Yeah.
And then you later say, "We can get lunch and then head over." She responds, "Okay." And then you write that they'll let you use the gym and the pool while she's getting her massage. Is that correct?
Right.
And then you talk about plans for lunch and dinner. And so there were the plans, they just fell through, right?
Yeah, we canceled them. Yeah.
So it's not as if I made that up out of thin air, that's here in the text messages, correct?
Right. Yeah. It was just confusing because we were home. But yeah, when I left, I recollected that and then I found the picture and the picture was from September.
And was that from the wedding you went to?
Yeah.
If we could have the text messages marked as the next exhibit.
Any objection?
Nope.
That may be admitted.
487
Now in cross-examination, you said that Lindsay always took the medications exactly as instructed, but in direct, you said you weren't always with her every time she took the pills. Is that correct?
That's correct, but the understanding was that she took it as directed.
Because she told you she did?
Yeah.
And because you trusted her to do so?
Yeah.
Okay. But you can't sit here and say definitively that she took every pill exactly as instructed every single time because you didn't watch her every time, correct?
I was not standing next to her every time she took pills.
And you were asked about the Facebook search in August, August 23rd, 2022. And you were asked about being on the Surface Pro and looking up the country singer who had killed himself. Is that right?
Right.
Okay. So I think that what you said when you were asked by defense counsel about whether or not you accidentally went to this site on methods of suicide, you said that could be likely that might've happened. You're not sure, correct?
Yeah, it's so subtle that I don't remember specifically, but I do remember listening to Tom T. Hall.
How often did you listen to him?
It was like for a week.
Okay. And so were you aware that on August 23rd, 2022, at 9:40 AM, someone signed into Lindsay's Facebook account on the Surface Pro?
No.
And then at 9:43 PM is when the Tom Hall site was accessed. Do you recall that?
Yeah.
And at 9:45 AM is when a person, not just hit a link by accident, but actually had to click on a link to go to suicide methods. Are you aware of that?
No.
Okay. Is there any reason why you would've been going in and logging onto Lindsay's Facebook account while going on Wikipedia and looking at suicide methods all in that same five minutes?
I didn't log into Lindsay's Facebook ever. It's very possible that I looked at Tom Hall's Wikipedia page.
At some point?
Yeah.
Do you remember spending three minutes on the methods of suicide site, scrolling through and reading the methods of suicide site for three minutes?
No, I don't remember something I did for three minutes almost four years ago.
Do you remember being on that site, the methods of suicide and clicking on a link to a bridge in Australia that people used to commit suicide?
No.
No. So in this five minutes or so where someone's using the Surface Pro, using Lindsay's Facebook while doing that, and then clicking on these links, you don't remember. You think it might've been you?
I have no idea.
Okay. Now you talked about Lindsay's stay at McLean Hospital. You said that it was a locked ward, she had to stay there. Is that correct?
Correct.
But it was a voluntary commitment, wasn't it?
Yeah.
You didn't file any legal paperwork to have her committed, correct?
Correct.
There was no court order making her stay there, correct?
Correct.
So if she wanted to leave and express to the doctors that she wanted to leave and they didn't believe she was a danger to herself or others, she could leave, correct?
To be honest, I don't know.
Okay. Now you stated on direct examination that you visited her two times during the time that she was there at McLean, right?
At least twice, yeah.
And you said those were in the evening hours, is that correct?
Yeah, afternoon, evening.
Afternoon and evening. So you weren't there during the morning and early afternoon hours when they were offering these group therapies and when she was meeting with other practitioners?
I wasn't there in the morning.
And were you there when the staff was checking on her every 15 minutes?
No, but she did tell me about that.
Okay. And were you aware that she was evaluated several times and at first she had to stay on the unit, but then eventually based on what she was telling them, she was allowed to go on the grounds with staff?
I was aware that she went on, I think at least one walk.
Okay. And so people were seeing her and interacting with her in changing the way her stay went at McLean Hospital throughout her stay?
Yeah.
And you talked about Dr. Goodheart recommending medications. What was the medication that you said that she recommended?
I though it was Cymbalta, but I think she ended up taking amitriptyline.
So looking here at the CVS records that you provided, we see... I'm sorry, here we go. So we see here. Here we go. Alia Goodheart. Second from the bottom.
Yep.
Trazodone, 50 milligrams. So you thought that Dr. Goodheart had just recommended medication when there was actually a prescription that was given by Dr. Goodheart, correct?
Right, but I believe, so there's another one as well, lorazepam. I believe those were prescribed while she was staying there.
And so they were filled at CVS and sent to McLean?
Possibly. I remember there was an issue where she didn't have her medications when she went to McLean, so she needed them to be brought there.
She was discharged on January 5th, correct?
Right.
Are you aware that this document from CVS says that the prescription for trazodone 50 milligrams prescribed by Dr. Alia Goodheart was filled on January 5th, 2023?
Right.
Okay. And then the other prescription by Dr. Goodheart, the one milligram lorazepam was also filled on January 5th, 2023, correct?
Yeah.
So that's when she was discharged, not while she was staying there, correct?
Right, that's correct.
So Dr. Goodheart did in fact prescribe medication for Lindsay, trazodone and Ativan and not Cymbalta, correct?
She recommended Cymbalta, but she wasn't the one who prescribed that.
In fact, no one prescribed that, correct?
Because it ended up switching to amitriptyline.
And the amitriptyline was prescribed by Dr. Jennifer Tufts, correct?
Right.
And Dr. Tufts prescribed five milligrams of diazepam on January 9th, 2023, correct?
Right.
And amitriptyline on January 16th, it was 10 milligrams of amitriptyline. And that was prescribed when Lindsay said she was having some issues with depression, correct?
Correct.
Okay. So she went to McLean Hospital and she was weaned off the Seroquel, correct?
I believe so, yeah.
And all the medications that she had taken prior to going to McLean, she was no longer on, those were gone, correct? Once she had been in McLean?
I'm not sure. I don't know if it was all of them.
Well, did you have conversations with your wife about what she was taking? Were you aware that she was only prescribed trazodone and Ativan when she left McLean and then amitriptyline was only added on the 16th? So just those three medications?
Yeah, but I thought she was taking trazodone before McLean.
Right. So she had been prescribed it before and stopped taking it, correct?
I don't remember. I'd have to look back on records.
So you're not sure about what she was taking and when, are you?
Not the exact dates, but I remember she was taking trazodone and I thought she was taking it before McLean.
So the best resource of what she was prescribed and when would most likely be the doctors and the CVS records then, correct?
The CVS records is a good resource.
Okay. And you talked about the pills and how these were pills that she was no longer on. So it wasn't really a good representation of what she had taken, correct?
Correct.
But she was only prescribed Zoloft once, right? At the very beginning?
Right.
And she only took seven of those pills, correct?
Right.
So it wasn't as if she was prescribed a higher dose or a different dose of Zoloft and was still taking that. And so that seven pills misrepresents the Zoloft she took, right?
I believe she switched because, or she stopped because she was switched to Prozac.
Okay. And then even going forward, the Prozac, there weren't many pills taken out of that either, correct?
Yeah, eventually she stopped that as well.
Okay. So she'd take a few pills, she'd have some side effects, they'd switch the medication, correct?
Yes.
And so they were trying to figure out what would work for her, correct?
Yeah.
Okay. And then she ends up at McLean because she's having difficulties according to her with the Seroquel, correct?
That was part of it, yeah.
And they wean her off of that, right?
Yep.
And then after McLean, she's only on the trazodone, the Ativan, and then on the 16th adding in the amitriptyline, correct?
Right.
You mentioned that you went to New York in November of 2022. Defense counsel said that was a month before the children were killed, but that's actually two months before they were killed, correct?
Yeah, it was about a little more than two months.
And she hadn't been on the Seroquel yet, right?
I don't know exactly when she started the Seroquel.
Would December sound right?
Yeah. Or end of November. Yeah.
And so when you took your trip to New York, she was having some issues, but she was doing okay, wasn't she?
She was doing much better than she was in December.
Okay. And did you also take another trip with Cora in November?
Yeah. So I did the trip to New York, and as soon as I got back, went to bed, and then the next morning left with Cora.
And was that November 4th through the 7th to San Francisco?
Yeah.
And who was taking care of Dawson and Callan while you were in San Francisco with Cora?
Lindsay.
And so during your trip to New York and then immediately after your trip to San Francisco with Cora, were there any issues or any problems or did anything happen while Lindsay was caring for those kids?
Nothing bad happened. I would say her anxiety and depression was starting to tick up, but yeah, obviously nothing bad happened.
Okay. And it's your testimony that things started to get worse in December. Is that correct?
Correct.
But it was also your testimony that after the stay at McLean, things got better, wasn't it?
Yeah.
And she steadily progressed throughout January getting better, right?
Definitely, yeah.
And on January 24th, 2023, you testified that that was one of her best days.
Yeah.
You were asked about the Apple Watch. The police didn't collect the Apple Watch, right? They did collect her phone, correct? You identified it earlier, right?
Correct. Yeah.
And her Apple Watch was linked to her phone, was it not?
It probably was, yeah.
You were also asked about the drop from the second floor window. Were you aware that the measurement from the window sill to the ground was actually 12 feet?
I've never measured it, but yeah, I believe what you're saying.
And I was looking for one of the exhibits from defense counsel. It's the... Yes. Exhibit 84, this was the packet here that defense counsel was going through with you where you said this is Lindsay writing Callan's schedule. Is that right?
Right.
But this was also Lindsay sending notes back and forth between herself and Elaine. Is that correct?
Possibly.
There's different writing here, correct? You want to look at it?
Yeah.
For example, this first page after the cover, we have writing here that you said was Lindsay's, correct?
It looks like it, yeah.
And then down here, there's a note that's in different handwriting, correct?
Yeah, I would say so.
Okay. So were you aware that Lindsay was using this notebook to communicate back and forth with the nanny about Callan's care?
She had different notebooks. She always had a notebook that she would leave for the babysitter or for me.
And so for example, on Tuesday, September 4th, she wrote, "Last fed at 6:00 AM. Give him a bottle whenever he wakes up. He likes it very warm. He's been resisting the bottle. If he won't drink it after 45 minutes of trying, please text me to let me know. Put down for next nap one hour after he wakes. Try to put down drowsy but awake. But if he cries, pick him up and rock, bounce or hold him until sleep. Then put down. He usually sleeps 45 minutes, but let him sleep as long as he wants." There's even very detailed notes that Lindsay is sending to the nanny, correct?
Yeah.
And then she also wrote, "If you have time, wash and cut up veggies, sweet potatoes, one inch cubes peeled, broccoli, small pieces, peppers, one inch pieces, plastic Ziploc bags to put them in. Next bottle, two and a half hours after the first bottle." Correct?
I believe what you're reading, yeah.
So very particular about what she wanted the nanny to do, how she wanted her to do it, and when to feed Callan, when to put him down for a nap, all of those things. Very particular, correct?
Sounds like it, yeah.
Again, Thursday, September 29th, 2022, "Callan last fed at 8:45. Please put him down for a nap at 9:35. He will be home from gymnastics at 11:45. Clean clothes and dryer if you get to it." So again, very specific times for putting him down and when to get up and asking her to do additional work like laundry and things like that, correct?
Yeah.
Again, October 6th, "Ate at 8:15. Fell asleep at 8:40. Changing tables now in the bathroom. If he wakes before 9:40, give him 15 minutes to settle himself back to sleep. I'm hoping he will sleep till 10:15. If he is still asleep at 10:40, wake him. Feeding at 11:00 AM. First try bottle. If he doesn't take it after 15 minutes, make oatmeal. Two tablespoons of oatmeal, make thin with breast milk, can heat for 5 to 10 seconds." Again, very specific directions on what she wants done and how she wants Callan cared for, correct?
Yeah.
And throughout this notebook, it's more of the same, correct? Or have you even seen that?
I haven't seen it. Yeah.
I have nothing further. Thank you.
So which nanny was that?
That would've been Elaine Rossi.
And Elaine Rossi, how long was she the nanny for you guys?
A month or two. Yeah, probably two months.
And then she just needed more hours and moved on and Lindsay was home.
Yeah. I think she preferred more hours. We couldn't really give it to her. And Lindsay was home anyways.
And as far as the records are concerned, is it fair to say that Lindsay, as a concerned mother, would give instructions to people that would be taking care of her infant?
Yeah, I would've done the same.
A lot of discussion about these prescriptions and scripts from the different doctors. And one of the things you referenced was that you believed that she was on trazodone. And if I suggest to you that there was a Dr. Izadpanah Kayvon on November 16th of '22 that prescribed 50 milligrams of trazodone while she was on buspirone and fluoxetine, does that refresh your memory that in November she was prescribed 50 grams of trazodone?
Yeah, I remember trazodone being a part of the medication plan for a while.
And one of the things that you did as we talked about is you went to CVS and you got a list of all the drugs, right?
Right.
And if I suggest to you, sir, that this is just an easy reference with different colors for different doctors of exactly what the CVS provided, does that appear to be fair and accurate of the scripts that were provided?
Yeah. Yep.
Can I see which one that is, please? No objection.
Okay. That may be admitted.
That's all I have, sir. Thank you.
Okay.
[inaudible 07:16:04].
All right. Thank you, sir. You may step down. Thank you. Counsel, can I see you? The jury, I know it's been a long day for everyone, so we're going to excuse you till tomorrow morning. The hope is we'll start about 9:00 and kind of the same thing. We'll go to hopefully about 11:00, take a break at 11:00. We'll have a break from 1:00 to 2:00 and we'll go into the afternoon around 3:00 or 4:00. All right? So that's the thing. Remember, I'm going to ask you those questions about not talking about the case, not doing any research about it, I don't watch anything about it, you still have to keep an open mind. At this point, you've heard some evidence, but you haven't heard all the evidence, and you haven't heard the law that you are to apply to the evidence. So at this point, you've got to keep struggling in a sense, keep that open mind. So I'm going to excuse you. I hope you have a nice evening. We'll come back here tomorrow morning. If I forget to tell you tomorrow, Friday, we're still on the schedule to take that view, and then we'll deal with the schedule going to come in tomorrow. But as best I can tell you, that's the schedule for tomorrow. So again, thank you so much for all your work on this case so far. I hope you have a nice evening. We'll see you tomorrow.
All right. All rise. Good. [inaudible 07:18:50] please.
All right. So we'll be in recess on this matter till tomorrow morning at 9:00. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you. A confirmation email is on it’s way to your inbox. document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function () { const emailShare = document.getElementById("email-share"); if (!emailShare) return; emailShare.addEventListener("click", function (event) { event.preventDefault(); // Prevent default anchor behavior const h1Text = document.querySelector("h1")?.textContent.trim() || "Check this out"; const postUrl = encodeURIComponent(window.location.href); const mailtoLink = `mailto:?subject=${encodeURIComponent(h1Text)}&body=Read more here: ${postUrl}`; window.location.href = mailtoLink; // Force the mailto action }); }); /* window.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { // Copy to clipboard // Style for the toast notification const toastStyle = ` position: fixed; bottom: 20px; left: 50%; transform: translateX(-50%); background-color: #a04dff; color: #ebebeb; padding: 10px 20px; border-radius: 5px; font-weight: 600; z-index: 1000; opacity: 0; transition: opacity 0.3s ease-in-out; `; // Function to create and show the toast function showToast(message) { const toast = document.createElement('div'); toast.textContent = message; toast.style.cssText = toastStyle; document.body.appendChild(toast); // Trigger reflow toast.offsetHeight; // Show the toast toast.style.opacity = '1'; // Hide the toast after 2 seconds setTimeout(() => { toast.style.opacity = '0'; setTimeout(() => { document.body.removeChild(toast); }, 300); }, 2000); } // Function to copy text to clipboard function copyToClipboard(text) { navigator.clipboard.writeText(text).then(() => { showToast('Copied'); }).catch(err => { console.error('Failed to copy: ', err); }); } // Select all elements with clipboard-link attribute const clipboardLinks = document.querySelectorAll('[clipboard-link="true"]'); // Add click event listener to each clipboard link clipboardLinks.forEach(link => { link.addEventListener('click', (event) => { event.preventDefault(); // Prevent the default link behavior copyToClipboard(window.location.href); }); }); }); */ Copyright Disclaimer Under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Sign up to get Rev content delivered straight to your inbox.